The inheritance contains different kinds of map: historical arguments, visual teaching accounts, explicit source networks, and bibliometric signals. A common drawing style is not evidence that their lines mean the same thing.
This review identifies the public works and the available source texts. Text search did not establish a complete inventory of image-only files. Private storage details and source files are not republished.
Source-owner-reviewed package preserved: 650 nodes and 1,320 source links. Existing reconciliation is not automatic equivalence.
Next evidence: Independent evidence for selected influences; further human reconciliation requires a finite cohort and named reviewer.
307 outward destinations retained. This release records a fresh reachability check without changing source-published labels.
Next evidence: Review 28 alt/title disagreements and interpret destination mismatches; HTTP success does not settle accuracy.
98 nodes and 1,856 aggregate signals remain a separate comparator.
Next evidence: Recover the lawful input manifest and missing shrink step before claiming independent reproducibility.
Existing nine-source review preserves the distinction between article reading and individual entry verification.
Next evidence: Reconcile individual propositions only where their sources justify a controlled relation.
The authors describe a situated, non-exhaustive visual exploration of overlapping currents and inheritances.
Next evidence: Keep its situated and non-exhaustive scope; do not impose precise dates on its currents.
Several available copies share this extracted heading, including filenames suggesting other authors. Filenames are insufficient evidence of authorship.
Next evidence: Locate the source image and licence; compare versions before treating files as duplicates.
A draft historical account was identified in the available map materials.
Next evidence: Confirm an authoritative public edition and distinguish historical argument from a relation dataset.
A public chronology provides dated historical leads.
Next evidence: Each proposed teaching, influence, or collaboration relation needs its own evidence.
The inspected text-only copy identifies Rasmussen and acknowledges Troncale and Tuddenham.
Next evidence: Recover the diagrams and their stated semantics before mapping individual relationships.
The inspected extract attributes the figure to Wright and describes inspiration from Castellani.
Next evidence: Locate the complete thesis and figure; avoid attributing the work from a storage filename.
A diagram was identified in the available source material.
Next evidence: Resolve authorship, rights, and the meaning of connectors before transcription.
Its caption distinguishes concept-to-packet or packet-to-packet solid lines from concept-to-concept dotted lines; crossings do not establish junctions.
Next evidence: Locate the complete figure and Table I together, then transcribe the specified relation types.
A collection overview was inspected; a text-search result is not a complete inventory of image-only files.
Next evidence: Obtain a complete file listing and reconcile image-only items without publishing private storage details.
239 responded; 16 unavailable in this check; 26 access or server response requires review; 26 could not verify. These results describe this check, not permanent availability or semantic correctness. Source labels and comparator bytes remain unchanged.
Download the complete dated audit
Read the map principles · Inspect the remaining action programme