Readable atlas · Release 0.37
Dynamic Models of Segregation
An investigation of how local composition requirements, movement rules, and interaction can produce aggregate segregation patterns, using several distinct abstract models.
Open the interactive entry · Explore its map · Download the sourced record (JSON)
Summary
A move changes the neighbours and possible moves of others. The article examines line, spatial-grid, compartment, and tipping models; its outcomes depend on how neighbourhoods, thresholds, vacancies, groups, and movement are specified. A board result is not a quantitative estimate for an actual community.
Implications for practice
A visible aggregate pattern does not by itself identify the motives, constraints, or feedbacks that produced it. A model can separate rival mechanisms without establishing which one operates in a place.
Key distinctions
- An acceptance threshold, a movement rule, and a measured spatial outcome are different parts of the explanation.
- A position-relative neighbourhood differs from a shared fixed compartment. The article is not one universal checkerboard algorithm.
- Satisfaction with a stipulated rule is not justice. Composition preferences in these examples can be discriminatory even when complete separation is not demanded.
Historical development
[]
Ideas it depends on
[]
Further developments
[]
Connections to practice
- Original model example: the illustrated 13×16 grid uses up to eight surrounding squares and a requirement that at least half of occupied neighbours have the resident's type. In the reported run, residents without an opposite-type neighbour rise from 13 of 138 to 54 of 138. This is one artificial-board outcome.
- Fictional editorial inquiry: define an abstract token-placement rule, vacancies, boundary cases, tie-breaking order, and a move limit. Vary the starting arrangement and acceptance threshold; record cycles or lack of a suitable vacancy rather than assume convergence.
- Editorial transfer limit: investigate actual categories, institutional constraints, unequal power, coercion, and alternative causes. A similar-looking distribution is not evidence that the board mechanism explains it.
Common confusions
- The model shows that racism and institutions are irrelevant to actual segregation.
- A threshold allowing some mixture is a demand for complete separation.
- One illustrated run supplies a general forecast or a measure of social desirability.
Further checks
- The source PDF was read but a local byte hash could not be obtained.
- The source account preserves multiple models; no empirical claim about a particular population is made.
Recorded connections
Check the wording, direction, scope, sources, and status of a connection before relying on it.
Dynamic Models of Segregation authored by T. C. Schelling
Status: accepted · Relation: authored by
Bibliographic first pass: records authorship or collection structure, not a full evaluation of the work or influence.
Locator: Official Foundational Papers in Complexity Science table of contents
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
Dynamic Models of Segregation is part of Foundational Papers in Complexity Science, volume 2
Status: accepted · Relation: part of
Bibliographic first pass: records authorship or collection structure, not a full evaluation of the work or influence.
Locator: Official Foundational Papers in Complexity Science table of contents
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
Dynamic Models of Segregation is item in Foundational Papers in Complexity Science
Status: accepted · Relation: part of
Official table of contents, volume 2, item 37.
No statement-level locator recorded.
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
Status: accepted · Relation: presents
This records documentary collection structure only. Inclusion does not by itself establish conceptual influence, agreement, importance or validity.
Locator: Official collection table of contents
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
Status: accepted · Relation: presents
This records documentary collection structure only. Inclusion does not by itself establish conceptual influence, agreement, importance or validity.
Locator: Official collection table of contents
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
Sources and passage locators
- Foundational Papers in Complexity Science — official tables of contents (checked primary register)
- Dynamic Models of Segregation (research pass needs editor)
- Dynamic Models of Segregation: pp. 143–150, especially pp. 148–150 and figure 1 · research pass needs editor
- Dynamic Models of Segregation: pp. 155–159, figures 7, 9, and 11 · research pass needs editor
- Dynamic Models of Segregation: pp. 143–145 and 158–164 · research pass needs editor
Cite this entry
Taylor, B. P. (2026). Dynamic Models of Segregation. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.37. https://transduction.systems/entries/publication_fpcs_037/
Include the release and review status when you quote or reuse this account.