Core methods | about 60 minutes | free
Choose a recursion, identify operational units, and test management functions without turning the VSM into an organisation chart.
A basic organisational diagnosis. Functions can be distributed or combined in people and groups. The exercise does not establish that every multi-agency network has a single legitimate metasystem.
This is original learning material, not a reproduced official course. Mechanical checks have determinate answers within the stated case. Worked comparisons for open judgements show defensible reasoning, not the only possible model. Specialist pedagogical review is not recorded.
Fictional case: Neighbourhood Advice Cooperative runs North, Central and South advice centres. Each serves local residents, organises its own advisers and decides ordinary cases. They share specialist interpreters and sometimes double-book them. A cooperative operations group negotiates budgets and capacity with centre leads. A quality reviewer periodically observes cases directly, with an agreed learning remit. A small planning group studies changing resident needs and technology, but its reports rarely reach operations. The elected board sets identity and purpose and settles major policy disputes. An urgent safeguarding concern currently travels through three monthly reporting meetings.
Use paper, your own drawing tool or the notes below. Attempt each step before opening its comparison. Describe a diagram in words when that is more accessible.
Produce: A recursion statement and three candidate operational units.
Focal system: the advice cooperative as a whole. Candidate System 1 units: the three centres, each with an operation, local management and a relevant environment. Within a centre, case teams may form the next level if they genuinely carry primary activity with appropriate management. A wider partnership is only a candidate level above: do not assert that it governs the cooperative without evidence and legitimacy.
Produce: A function-evidence table, leaving unknowns visible.
System 1: centres delivering advice in their local environments. System 2: arrangements damping interference between centres, such as interpreter booking protocols; the double-booking suggests a gap. System 3: the operations group's resource bargains, synergy and internal regulation. System 3*: the agreed direct sampling of operational reality, distinct from routine reports. System 4: the planning group's outside-and-future intelligence. System 5: identity, policy and balancing present and future through the elected board. These are functions evidenced by activities, not job titles.
Produce: Two hypotheses, each with a verification question.
The System 3/4 dialogue may be weak: ask how a recent external change altered an operational decision, and how operational experience revised a future proposal. Urgent safeguarding signals are too slow for their purpose: trace a concern's actual escalation and response time. A System 2 booking weakness is another defensible hypothesis. A missing line in your diagram alone is not proof that the function is absent.
Produce: One bounded change and a check for over-centralisation.
Give centres a shared interpreter availability view and agreed conflict-resolution protocol, while leaving normal case decisions local. Establish a direct urgent escalation route with named response responsibility. For future adaptation, create a recurring 3/4 conversation using both demand evidence and operational constraints. Check whether the new arrangement removes local discretion that does not need to be centralised.
Produce: A short sampling plan.
Trace an ordinary case, a cross-centre resource conflict, a future-driven change and an urgent exception. Ask the people doing the work how information and authority actually move. Distinguish formal policy from observed practice. Use direct observation with a legitimate remit, not covert inspection presented as neutral learning.
Match activities, not people or job grades. This checks the supplied case; other organisations require evidence of what each activity does.
These checks test the supplied case, not your overall competence. Open answers and model variants still need your judgement.
The chief executive is labelled S5, all middle managers S2, every worker S1, and the outside world is omitted.
Choose the recursion and primary activities first. Identify actual functions, environments and channels. One person may perform several functions; a worker may exercise local intelligence and policy. An organisational rank is not a VSM system number.
An autonomous helpline is added with its own users, case decisions and local management. Is it necessarily System 2 because it connects centres?
No. It may be another System 1 unit if advice delivery is a primary activity at the chosen recursion. Some of its activities could also support coordination. Determine function, operational autonomy and environment rather than classifying it by the word 'helpline'.
A different model can be defensible when its purpose, assumptions and reasoning are explicit. A contradiction, incorrect unit, invented fact or unacknowledged change of purpose needs repair. Keep both your first attempt and revision.
No sign-in or submission is required. Notes are not sent by this practice tool. Use fictional information, not identifiable client or learner data. Saving stores this page's attempt only in this browser; clearing browser data can remove it. Export a copy to keep it elsewhere.
The complete original case above is free. Links below distinguish exercises from explanations, recordings, software and paid study. Reading a page or drawing in a tool is not itself a model check.
Use the editable diagrams after identifying your focal system, operational units and channels. A completed template is not evidence that the diagnosis is sound.
Diagram links and Jon Walker's editing instructions inspected. Templates are not an answer validator.
A useful further route when reachable. This pack provides its own case and answer so access failure does not stop practice.
Bibliographic route identified; direct access was not confirmed in this research environment.
Choose the named introduction or core module matching your method. Check current price, access arrangements and feedback provision before paying.
Public listings inspected for VSM, SSM, CSH, SD, Patterns of Strategy, Mosaic and systems laws. Paid exercises and marking were not accessed.
Choose another practice area · Task-only version · Worked-answer version