{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/practice_lab_multi_methodology/",
  "release": "0.35",
  "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Practice: Multi-methodology: justify the move from one method to another. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.35. https://transduction.systems/entries/practice_lab_multi_methodology/",
  "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms",
  "entry": {
    "id": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
    "label": "Practice: Multi-methodology: justify the move from one method to another",
    "entity_type": "publication",
    "description": "Design a short inquiry in which each method answers a different question and its output is translated carefully into the next. A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
    "aliases": [],
    "boundary_ring": "0",
    "inclusion_reason": "authorised_systems_methods_practice_pack",
    "status": "candidate",
    "source_ids": [
      "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "src_practice_external_scio_other",
      "src_practice_external_scio_reading",
      "src_scio_professional_development_current"
    ],
    "set_tags": [
      "systems",
      "practice",
      "learning",
      "apprenticeship"
    ],
    "espoused_labels": [],
    "observed_clusters": [],
    "canonical_definition": "Design a short inquiry in which each method answers a different question and its output is translated carefully into the next. A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
    "valid_from": "",
    "valid_to": "",
    "external_ids": "{\"practice_url\": \"https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/multi-methodology/\"}",
    "geographies": [],
    "licence": "",
    "review_status": "original_practice_material_specialist_review_not_recorded",
    "reviewed_by": "",
    "reviewed_at": "",
    "x": 0.38,
    "y": 0.34,
    "canonical_id": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
    "public_visibility": "public",
    "publication_level": "profile",
    "public_stub_text": "",
    "public_source_count": 4,
    "no_public_link_count": 0
  },
  "profile": {
    "node_id": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
    "summary": "Design a short inquiry in which each method answers a different question and its output is translated carefully into the next. A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
    "canonical_definition": "Design a short inquiry in which each method answers a different question and its output is translated carefully into the next. A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
    "why_it_matters": "A concrete rehearsal with a fictional case, explicit outputs and a way to inspect the result.",
    "key_distinctions": [
      "Mechanical correctness is distinct from judgement in an open situation.",
      "Training-case application is distinct from competent organisational practice."
    ],
    "historical_lineage": [],
    "logical_antecedents": [],
    "dependent_subsequents": [],
    "practice_connections": [
      "Separate the questions that require different kinds of inquiry.",
      "Choose a justified three-method sequence.",
      "Specify the transition into the numerical model.",
      "Set a trigger to change your method design."
    ],
    "common_misreadings": [
      "A worked comparison is not the only acceptable answer to an open question."
    ],
    "open_checks": [
      "A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
      "Compare an independent attempt before revealing the worked answer."
    ],
    "source_ids": [
      "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "src_practice_external_scio_other",
      "src_practice_external_scio_reading",
      "src_scio_professional_development_current"
    ],
    "context_and_lineage": "Original educational resource, 7 September 2026.",
    "editorial_note": "Prepared with AI assistance. Publication authorised by Benjamin P Taylor. No independent specialist review or source-provider endorsement is claimed.",
    "last_researched": "2026-09-07",
    "title": "Practice: Multi-methodology: justify the move from one method to another",
    "profile_status": "original_practice_resource",
    "review_status": "specialist_review_not_recorded"
  },
  "connections": [
    {
      "id": "practice_edge_766ee7aa66cedc937b",
      "source": "practice_systems_methods_pack",
      "target": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "relation_type": "includes_practice_resource",
      "relation_family": "practice",
      "directed": "true",
      "dependency_kind": "",
      "confidence": "",
      "claim_status": "candidate",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_systems_methods_practice_pack"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement",
      "valid_from": "",
      "valid_to": "",
      "scope_conditions": "Resource inventory only; completing a page is not accreditation.",
      "assertion_mode": "asserted",
      "inference_method": "",
      "claim_id": "",
      "reviewed_by": "",
      "reviewed_at": "",
      "notes": "",
      "plain_phrase": "includes practice resource",
      "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence"
    },
    {
      "id": "practice_edge_bcb81d923727ad81de",
      "source": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "target": "method_or_methodology_multi_methodology_including_sosm",
      "relation_type": "provides_practice_for",
      "relation_family": "practice",
      "directed": "true",
      "dependency_kind": "",
      "confidence": "",
      "claim_status": "candidate",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement",
      "valid_from": "",
      "valid_to": "",
      "scope_conditions": "A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
      "assertion_mode": "asserted",
      "inference_method": "",
      "claim_id": "",
      "reviewed_by": "",
      "reviewed_at": "",
      "notes": "",
      "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for",
      "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence"
    },
    {
      "id": "practice_edge_38dd2ea7bb4e22089b",
      "source": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "target": "tradition_critical_systems_thinking",
      "relation_type": "provides_practice_for",
      "relation_family": "practice",
      "directed": "true",
      "dependency_kind": "",
      "confidence": "",
      "claim_status": "candidate",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement",
      "valid_from": "",
      "valid_to": "",
      "scope_conditions": "A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
      "assertion_mode": "asserted",
      "inference_method": "",
      "claim_id": "",
      "reviewed_by": "",
      "reviewed_at": "",
      "notes": "",
      "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for",
      "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence"
    },
    {
      "id": "practice_edge_5a177df0b18d13fc3a",
      "source": "practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "target": "method_or_methodology_systemic_intervention",
      "relation_type": "provides_practice_for",
      "relation_family": "practice",
      "directed": "true",
      "dependency_kind": "",
      "confidence": "",
      "claim_status": "candidate",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement",
      "valid_from": "",
      "valid_to": "",
      "scope_conditions": "A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
      "assertion_mode": "asserted",
      "inference_method": "",
      "claim_id": "",
      "reviewed_by": "",
      "reviewed_at": "",
      "notes": "",
      "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for",
      "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence"
    }
  ],
  "claims": [],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "src_practice_lab_multi_methodology",
      "title": "Multi-methodology: justify the move from one method to another",
      "source_type": "practice_resource",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/multi-methodology/",
      "date": "2026-09-07",
      "notes": "Original fictional exercise. A basic methodological design exercise. There is no universal correct sequence. The checks concern fit, assumptions and transitions, not allegiance to one classification of methods.",
      "creators": [
        "The Necessary Tangle editorial practice pack"
      ],
      "doi": "",
      "isbn": "",
      "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle",
      "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded",
      "last_checked": "2026-09-07",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    },
    {
      "id": "src_practice_external_scio_other",
      "title": "SCiO: Mosaic, multi-methodology, CONAN and INFORMED",
      "source_type": "public_learning_resource",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/why-practice-systems-thinking/other-methods",
      "date": "2026-09-07",
      "notes": "Method descriptions and linked talks/books inspected. Provider claims about success rates are not adopted by this pack. Use: Use for orientation and source discovery. It is not a free self-check workbook; use the original exercises here.",
      "creators": [],
      "doi": "",
      "isbn": "",
      "publisher": "www.systemspractice.org",
      "licence": "External source terms; linked, not reproduced",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "specific_access_and_content_limit_recorded",
      "last_checked": "2026-09-07",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    },
    {
      "id": "src_practice_external_scio_reading",
      "title": "SCiO competency framework resource guide (PDF)",
      "source_type": "public_learning_resource",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/v5vl9o1e9gtwxbqiyb2no/SCiO-CF-Resources.pdf?rlkey=a9d5ckhbsdjld7ab3sp60jaj9&dl=0",
      "date": "2026-09-07",
      "notes": "Public sharing confirmed; approach and theory bibliography inspected. The presence of a reference does not establish that it contains self-check exercises. Use: Further reading for each framework row, including the separate references associated with transposing theory.",
      "creators": [],
      "doi": "",
      "isbn": "",
      "publisher": "www.dropbox.com",
      "licence": "External source terms; linked, not reproduced",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "specific_access_and_content_limit_recorded",
      "last_checked": "2026-09-07",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    },
    {
      "id": "src_scio_professional_development_current",
      "title": "SCiO Professional Development",
      "source_type": "official_training_page",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/professional-development",
      "date": "",
      "notes": "Official SCiO page describing systems-practice and intervention training, delivery formats and the relationship between methods and intervention skills.",
      "creators": [
        "SCiO - Systems and Complexity in Organisation"
      ],
      "doi": "",
      "isbn": "",
      "publisher": "SCiO",
      "licence": "source_terms",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "checked",
      "last_checked": "2026-08-10",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    },
    {
      "id": "src_systems_methods_practice_pack",
      "title": "Systemic systems methods practice for systems practice (alpha)",
      "source_type": "practice_resource",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/",
      "date": "2026-09-07",
      "notes": "Alpha version. The original teaching material has not had independent specialist pedagogical review. These exercises support technical learning; they do not establish professional competence or accreditation.",
      "creators": [
        "Benjamin P Taylor"
      ],
      "doi": "",
      "isbn": "",
      "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle",
      "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded",
      "last_checked": "2026-09-07",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    }
  ],
  "evidence_locators": [],
  "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded."
}