{ "schema_version": "1.0", "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh/", "release": "0.35", "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH). The Necessary Tangle, release 0.35. https://transduction.systems/entries/method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh/", "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms", "entry": { "id": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "label": "Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH)", "entity_type": "method_or_methodology", "description": "Critical Systems Heuristics is a framework for examining the boundary judgements built into plans and interventions: who benefits, who decides, what counts as expertise, and who or what is left outside.", "aliases": [ "CSH", "critical systems heuristic" ], "boundary_ring": "0", "inclusion_reason": "seed_corpus", "status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "set_tags": [ "systems", "practice" ], "espoused_labels": [], "observed_clusters": [], "canonical_definition": "", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "external_ids": "{}", "geographies": [], "licence": "", "review_status": "curator_checked_public_sources", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "x": -0.33277, "y": -0.263584, "canonical_id": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "public_visibility": "public", "publication_level": "profile", "public_stub_text": "", "public_source_count": 1, "no_public_link_count": 1 }, "profile": { "node_id": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "title": "Critical Systems Heuristics (CSH)", "profile_status": "curator_checked_public_sources", "canonical_definition": "Critical Systems Heuristics is a framework for examining the boundary judgements built into plans and interventions: who benefits, who decides, what counts as expertise, and who or what is left outside.", "summary": "Critical Systems Heuristics is a framework for reflective and critical practice which makes boundary judgements and their consequences discussable.", "why_it_matters": "CSH provides a disciplined way to examine who benefits, who decides, what counts as knowledge and how those affected can challenge claims to improvement.", "key_distinctions": [ "is vs ought", "involved vs affected", "boundary judgement vs neutral fact", "heuristic vs algorithm" ], "historical_lineage": [ "C. West Churchman", "Werner Ulrich", "critical systems thinking" ], "logical_antecedents": [ "boundary", "purpose", "legitimacy", "knowledge", "power" ], "dependent_subsequents": [ "twelve boundary questions", "boundary critique", "citizen competence" ], "practice_connections": [ "policy appraisal", "evaluation", "participative inquiry", "professional critique" ], "espoused_lineages": [], "observed_clusters": [], "common_misreadings": [ "CSH discovers the correct boundary", "the twelve questions are a checklist survey", "only emancipatory projects can use CSH" ], "open_checks": [ "add primary book sources", "connect systemic marginalisation", "develop cases and criticism" ], "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [], "last_researched": "2026-08-11", "review_status": "curator_checked_public_sources", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "editorial_note": "Developed from public primary, institutional and publisher sources. Open to correction, rival interpretation and stronger evidence." }, "connections": [ { "id": "e15_core_spine_csh", "source": "practice_core_systems_practice_spine", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "includes", "relation_family": "classification", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.15 public sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Limited to the named sources. Documentary connection, conceptual influence, teaching use and effectiveness are distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "includes as a major approach", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_005", "source": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "target": "law_or_principle_law_of_calling", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_scio_grammar_case_multiple_disadvantage", "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "turns boundary naming into critical inquiry through", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e_12_csh_taught_scio", "source": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "target": "organisation_scio_systems_and_complexity_in_organisation", "relation_type": "taught_in", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_courses_current" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.12 public practitioner and publication sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Bibliographic inclusion and organisational association do not establish wider intellectual influence.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, scholarly and professional-body sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-10", "notes": "SCiO currently lists Critical Systems Heuristics training.", "plain_phrase": "is taught in", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_13_csh_boundary_critique", "source": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "target": "concept_boundary_critique", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.13 public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Authorship, methodological development, conceptual dependence and practical use remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "Ulrich describes systematic boundary critique as CSH's methodological core.", "plain_phrase": "uses", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_13_primer_csh", "source": "publication_mini_primer_critical_systems_heuristics", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "explains", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.13 public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Authorship, methodological development, conceptual dependence and practical use remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "The mini-primer is a maintained primary introduction to CSH.", "plain_phrase": "explains", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_13_ulrich_csh", "source": "person_werner_ulrich", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "developed", "relation_family": "historical", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.13 public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Authorship, methodological development, conceptual dependence and practical use remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "Ulrich's primary account traces CSH to his 1983 work.", "plain_phrase": "developed", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "practice_edge_3fcda88cc92daff911", "source": "practice_lab_critical_systems_heuristics", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "provides_practice_for", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_practice_lab_critical_systems_heuristics" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This exercise checks the completeness and consistency of boundary reasoning. It does not supply a morally unique answer or pretend that the practitioner represents every affected person.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for", "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence" }, { "id": "practice_edge_96733d7a67da75f2d8", "source": "practice_lab_ethics_and_power", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "provides_practice_for", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_practice_lab_ethics_and_power" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "A generic ethical reasoning exercise. It cannot establish compliance with sector-specific law, safeguarding or professional requirements. Those require qualified, contextual checks before real action.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for", "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence" }, { "id": "e24_publication_reynolds_holwell_intro_2020_compares_method_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source": "publication_reynolds_holwell_intro_2020", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "compares_method", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_reynolds_holwell_intro_2020" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Chapter abstract, pp. 1–24 record", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The abstract supports the authors’ stated comparative rationale. It does not establish that the methods are interchangeable or that the whole chapter was read.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "compares the method", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded" }, { "id": "e26_85587e9e613cfe1a20844f", "source": "resource_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 420971; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of critical systems heuristic", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "target": "corpus_ing_ocad_reading_route_2026", "relation_type": "taught_in", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u31_ocad_proforma" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh" ], "source_locator": "Module_09", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Included as a proposed teaching topic in this published pro forma. This does not establish delivery, enrolment availability, or endorsement of every associated claim.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "taught in", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source": "tool_orglens", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u30_orglens" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh" ], "source_locator": "README: perspectives and boundaries lens", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The maintainer describes SSM and CSH as resources for a lens on perspectives and boundaries. This records the claimed design, not demonstrated organisational effectiveness.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "e34_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source": "tool_orglens", "target": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u34_orglens_architecture" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Perspectives: twelve boundary questions, coverage, unsupported_oughts", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "OrgLens records is/ought answers and unheard affected groups. Checking that supporting words exist cannot establish whether they express a legitimate ought judgement.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses", "public_review_label": "Source-scoped candidate; editorial review remains open", "connection_pass": "update_20261024" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "claim_e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "statement": "Included as a proposed teaching topic in this published pro forma. This does not establish delivery, enrolment availability, or endorsement of every associated claim.", "subject_id": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "predicate": "taught_in", "object_id": "corpus_ing_ocad_reading_route_2026", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u31_ocad_proforma" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Source-scoped interpretation. Human editorial acceptance remains pending.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "claim_e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "statement": "The maintainer describes SSM and CSH as resources for a lens on perspectives and boundaries. This records the claimed design, not demonstrated organisational effectiveness.", "subject_id": "tool_orglens", "predicate": "uses", "object_id": "method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u30_orglens" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Source-scoped interpretation. Human editorial acceptance remains pending.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" } ], "sources": [ { "id": "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "title": "SCiO CF Resources v9 draft", "source_type": "professional_framework_resource_guide", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2022-09-15", "notes": "SCiO internal competency-resource draft; no public link. Public SCiO accreditation pages are linked separately where possible.", "creators": [ "SCiO" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_legacy_internal_register_audit", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "title": "A Mini-Primer of Critical Systems Heuristics", "source_type": "primary_author_method_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://wulrich.com/csh.html", "date": "2005; updated 2023-05-20", "notes": "Werner Ulrich's maintained primary account defines Critical Systems Heuristics as reflective practice centred on systematic boundary critique and twelve critical boundary questions.", "creators": [ "Werner Ulrich" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Werner Ulrich", "licence": "noncommercial_distribution_and_citation_with_attribution", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_skills_england_st0787_v12", "title": "Systems Thinking Practitioner apprenticeship standard ST0787 v1.2", "source_type": "government_standard", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://skillsengland.education.gov.uk/apprenticeships/st0787-v1-2", "date": "2025-02-20", "notes": "Current approved standard; requires concepts, laws, provenance, schools, ontology, epistemology, approaches, intervention, ethics and evaluation.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "title": "The Grammar of Systems - SCiO presentation", "source_type": "presentation", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/grammar-systems", "date": "2022-03-21", "notes": "Lists 33 systems laws and principles and describes nine patterns of thinking.", "creators": [ "Patrick Hoverstadt" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "title": "The Grammar of Systems II: From Order to Chaos and Back Again, 2nd edition", "source_type": "book", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public_metadata", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/grammar-systems-ii-order-chaos-back-again-2nd-ed", "date": "2025-08-01", "notes": "Current second-edition metadata. The book presents nine systems-thinking patterns and 33 systems laws and principles.", "creators": [ "Patrick Hoverstadt" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "979-8298960878", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "publisher_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_grammar_case_multiple_disadvantage", "title": "Applying insight from Systems Laws to challenge thinking on, and service design for, the Multiple Disadvantage system", "source_type": "professional_case_study", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/applying-insight-systems-laws-challenge-thinking-and-service-design-multiple-disadvantage", "date": "2026-01-01", "notes": "Public SCiO case illustrating the Law of Calling, Law of Sufficient Complexity and Conant-Ashby Theorem in practice.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022", "title": "Cybersecurity Lessons from The Grammar of Systems, part 1", "source_type": "public_secondary_summary", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cybersecurity-lessons-from-grammar-systems-order-chaos-osama-salah/", "date": "2022-05-16", "notes": "Public secondary summary of Grammar of Systems items 1–11. Used as an accessible orientation aid; the book remains the controlling source.", "creators": [ "Osama Salah" ], "publisher": "LinkedIn", "licence": "publisher_terms", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_courses_current", "title": "SCiO all courses", "source_type": "official_professional_body_catalogue", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/courses", "date": "2026", "notes": "Current public catalogue of SCiO systems-practice and intervention courses. It is used to audit method and trainer coverage, not to establish the independent validity of a method.", "creators": [ "SCiO - Systems and Complexity in Organisation" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_practice_lab_critical_systems_heuristics", "title": "Critical Systems Heuristics: inspect all twelve boundary categories", "source_type": "practice_resource", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/critical-systems-heuristics/", "date": "2026-09-07", "notes": "Original fictional exercise. This exercise checks the completeness and consistency of boundary reasoning. It does not supply a morally unique answer or pretend that the practitioner represents every affected person.", "creators": [ "The Necessary Tangle editorial practice pack" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle", "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded", "last_checked": "2026-09-07", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_practice_lab_ethics_and_power", "title": "Ethics and power: make an intervention's authority and effects explicit", "source_type": "practice_resource", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/ethics-and-power/", "date": "2026-09-07", "notes": "Original fictional exercise. A generic ethical reasoning exercise. It cannot establish compliance with sector-specific law, safeguarding or professional requirements. Those require qualified, contextual checks before real action.", "creators": [ "The Necessary Tangle editorial practice pack" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle", "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded", "last_checked": "2026-09-07", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_reynolds_holwell_intro_2020", "title": "Introducing Systems Approaches", "source_type": "primary_chapter_abstract", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4471-7472-1_1", "date": "2026-09-09", "notes": "Abstract and publisher bibliographic record inspected. Full chapter is subscription content and was not reviewed.", "creators": [ "Martin Reynolds", "Sue Holwell" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scope_checked", "last_checked": "2026-09-09", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "september_connections_2026" }, { "id": "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "title": "Designing Social Systems in a Changing World", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9981-1", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Bela H. Banathy" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer US", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "1996" }, { "id": "src_u31_ocad_proforma", "title": "Understanding Systems: 2026 SFIN-6011 pro forma", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://coevolving.com/ocadu/202601-sfin-6011/pro-forma/Whole_2026_SFIN6011_pro-forma_v0101a.html", "date": "2026", "notes": "Complete twelve-module discussion pro forma read. Suggestions may not have entered the launched course. Module-linked works remain bibliographic leads unless separately reviewed.", "creators": [ "David Ing" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Coevolving / OCAD", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-08", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261008", "source_locator": "Module_01 through Module_12; introductory status and CC BY notice" }, { "id": "src_u30_orglens", "title": "OrgLens README", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://framagit.org/dynamicskillset/orglens", "date": "2026", "notes": "Maintainer description. Formerly VSMkit; current evidence concerns fictional test organisations, not demonstrated outcomes in real organisations.", "creators": [ "Doug Belshaw / Dynamic Skillset" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Dynamic Skillset", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-07", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261007", "source_locator": "README introduction, three lenses and What we have found" }, { "id": "src_u34_orglens_architecture", "title": "OrgLens technical overview and implemented lenses", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://framagit.org/dynamicskillset/orglens/-/blob/6ab72502741b1a9a9ccdc3dbaa8ad03e259bc536/docs/ARCHITECTURE.md", "date": "2026", "notes": "Doug Belshaw’s experimental tool separates model construction, deterministic checks, plain wording, and report writing. Its checked representation is not the organisation itself.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Original author or publisher", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-24", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261024", "source_locator": "The three lenses; Structure; Feedback loops; Perspectives; From findings to a report" } ], "evidence_locators": [ { "id": "ev_e31_ocad_9_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source_id": "src_u31_ocad_proforma", "locator": "Module_09", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_e31_orglens_method_or_methodology_critical_systems_heuristics_csh", "source_id": "src_u30_orglens", "locator": "README: perspectives and boundaries lens", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" } ], "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded." }