{ "schema_version": "1.0", "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_multiple_perspectives/", "release": "0.36", "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Multiple perspectives. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.36. https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_multiple_perspectives/", "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms", "entry": { "id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "label": "Multiple perspectives", "entity_type": "concept", "description": "Different accounts may expose a disagreement about what is happening, what matters, or whose action is possible. SSM uses declared worldviews and models to structure inquiry; CSH questions the facts and values made relevant by a boundary. These are distinct ways of working with differences.", "aliases": [], "boundary_ring": "0", "inclusion_reason": "seed_corpus", "status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_skills_england_st0787_v12", "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000", "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022" ], "set_tags": [ "systems", "core_concept" ], "espoused_labels": [], "observed_clusters": [], "canonical_definition": "Inquiry into how a situation changes when participants' purposes, boundaries, evidence, and possibilities for action are described from different positions.", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "external_ids": "{}", "geographies": [], "licence": "", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "x": 0.139361, "y": 0.222469, "canonical_id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "public_visibility": "public", "publication_level": "profile", "public_stub_text": "", "public_source_count": 4, "no_public_link_count": 0, "connection_pass": "depth_20261106" }, "profile": { "node_id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "title": "Multiple perspectives", "summary": "Different accounts may expose a disagreement about what is happening, what matters, or whose action is possible. SSM uses declared worldviews and models to structure inquiry; CSH questions the facts and values made relevant by a boundary. These are distinct ways of working with differences.", "canonical_definition": "Inquiry into how a situation changes when participants' purposes, boundaries, evidence, and possibilities for action are described from different positions.", "why_it_matters": "An inquiry needs to test alternative accounts and allow them to challenge its framing. That test may justify keeping the original question, changing a proposed action, or exposing a conflict that still requires a decision.", "editorial_note": "New profile. Source exposition is attributed to the relevant method; the general definition, comparison, and practice questions are editorial synthesis. The apprenticeship standard remains coverage evidence on the node, not proof of these theoretical claims.", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "key_distinctions": [ "different observations versus different criteria of improvement", "comparing accounts versus merging them into one model", "accommodation for action versus identical worldviews", "opportunity to contribute versus authority to decide" ], "historical_lineage": [ "This entry compares Checkland's SSM and Ulrich's CSH without claiming either exhausts the idea or that one descends from the other." ], "logical_antecedents": [ "situated accounts", "purposes", "boundary judgements" ], "dependent_subsequents": [ "revised problem definitions", "contested improvements", "workable action across disagreement" ], "practice_connections": [ "Write two coherent accounts of the same proposed change, including what would count as success in each.", "Keep a disagreement that changes the action visible. Record who must decide it and whose objection remains.", "Test an alternative framing by naming an action it makes available and the evidence that would justify trying it." ], "espoused_lineages": [], "observed_clusters": [], "common_misreadings": [ "A larger list of views guarantees fairness or completeness.", "Respect for people requires treating every factual claim as equally supported.", "Agreement to a course of action means the participants now share one interpretation." ], "open_checks": [ "The practice questions are editorial applications, not a combined SSM–CSH method.", "Whether people can object safely, and whether an accommodation is legitimate, need evidence from the actual setting." ], "source_ids": [ "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000", "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_checkland_models", "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation", "ev_u36_ulrich_critique" ], "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "profile_status": "evidence_deepened_research_pass", "last_researched": "2026-11-06", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, "connections": [ { "id": "e_overnight_ifsr_convening_perspectives", "source": "practice_systems_convening", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_ifsr_conversations_legacy", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "IFSR Conversations Legacy, programme-design paragraphs on non-hierarchical cross-tradition dialogue; Systems convening slides, slide 4", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The IFSR programme is an example interpreted through the atlas's systems-convening concept. The source does not use that label and does not demonstrate that dialogue resolves differences.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "cross-source comparison of programme design with the maintained practice definition", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Small, non-hierarchical conversations across traditions provide a concrete but limited example of creating conditions for multiple perspectives.", "plain_phrase": "can create a bounded space for", "public_review_label": "interpreted programme example" }, { "id": "e_overnight_pattern_manual_multiple_perspectives", "source": "publication_pattern_manual_service_systems_thinking", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.92", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ing_pattern_manual_2016" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Pattern Manual paper, p. 13, paragraph beginning 'Extending issues to explicitly identify voices'", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The paper operationalises perspectives as named voices around an issue; it does not guarantee that every affected perspective will be represented.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "close reading of the author paper", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Ing makes voices explicit in the service-systems pattern form so collective and individual perspectives are represented before action decisions.", "plain_phrase": "operationalises named voices as", "public_review_label": "source-established design move" }, { "id": "e_overnight_service_systems_multiple_perspectives", "source": "approach_family_service_systems_thinking", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "methodological_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "methodological", "confidence": "0.9", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ing_pattern_manual_2016", "src_ing_coevolving_publications_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Pattern Manual paper, pp. 12-14; Coevolving publication record abstract describing voices on issues", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The requirement is specific to Ing's proposed service-systems-thinking pattern form.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "comparison of the paper and author publication record", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "The proposal begins with plural voices on issues before decisions about action, making multiple perspectives constitutive of this version of the approach.", "plain_phrase": "requires explicit voices to represent", "public_review_label": "source-established method requirement" }, { "id": "e16_source_crosswalk_004", "source": "approach_family_systems_change", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.90", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "slide 4", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Author synthesis; no public link and no independent evidence of intervention effectiveness.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "direct reading of supplied author material", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Slide 4 makes different views of the system a resource for learning rather than a defect to remove.", "plain_phrase": "learns by seeing the system from", "public_review_label": "source-backed author synthesis; no public link" }, { "id": "e16_source_crosswalk_018", "source": "intervention_skill_productive_conversations", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.90", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_better_conversations_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "slides 2 and 16", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The feedback interpretation is a teaching synthesis, not an empirical causal estimate.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "direct reading of supplied author material", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Slides 2 and 16 treat different experienced realities as interpretations that productive conversation can make discussable.", "plain_phrase": "makes different interpretations discussable as", "public_review_label": "source-backed author synthesis; no public link" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_010", "source": "intervention_skill_appreciative_inquiry", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "elicits valued experience from", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_017", "source": "intervention_skill_constellations", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "tests hypotheses across", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_020", "source": "intervention_skill_conversation_mapping", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "retains disagreement among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_041", "source": "intervention_skill_detecting_and_managing_undiscussables", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "protects excluded or unsafe", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_043", "source": "intervention_skill_facilitation", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "designs participation across", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_053", "source": "intervention_skill_graphic_facilitation_and_visualisation", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "retains contributions from", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_061", "source": "intervention_skill_influencing_and_mediation", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "works with incompatible", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_064", "source": "intervention_skill_interview_technique", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "elicits situated", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_074", "source": "intervention_skill_large_group_decision_approaches", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "synthesises without erasing", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_088", "source": "intervention_skill_listening_and_multiple_perspectives", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "puts into conversational practice", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_093", "source": "intervention_skill_managing_deflection_resistance_and_challenge", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "resists pathologising disagreement by retaining", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_095", "source": "intervention_skill_metaphors", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "compares what different", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_102", "source": "intervention_skill_presentation_design", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "anticipates interpretation by", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_107", "source": "intervention_skill_public_speaking", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "adapts explanation for", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_109", "source": "intervention_skill_questionnaire_design", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "samples accounts from", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_120", "source": "intervention_skill_stakeholder_analysis", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "organises inquiry across", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_132", "source": "intervention_skill_values_mapping_and_integration", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "retains value conflict among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_160", "source": "method_or_methodology_confrontation_analysis_conan", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "represents incompatible positions among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_163", "source": "method_or_methodology_informed_group_dynamics", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "organises group inquiry across", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_167", "source": "method_or_methodology_interactive_management", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "structures dialogue among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_179", "source": "method_or_methodology_strategic_options_development_and_analysis_soda", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_ou_stip_2025", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "retains differing interpretations from", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_183", "source": "method_or_methodology_syntegration_team_syntegrity", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "creates repeated encounters among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_206", "source": "tool_rich_picture", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes room in one representation for", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_257", "source": "intervention_skill_ladder_of_inference", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "compares different selections and interpretations among", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_283", "source": "method_or_methodology_distributed_ethnography", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_cynefin_sensemaker_official_2026", "src_cynefin_dave_profile_2026", "src_skills_england_st0787_v12" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "develops accounts across distributed", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e26_f5c8da9e49baff76387a09", "source": "resource_lib26_3d2e2710c49aaf3d", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_lib26_3d2e2710c49aaf3d" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "PDF page 26", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_35e88aad5bb36a33402eeb", "source": "resource_lib26_a9c290f694efcc45", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_lib26_a9c290f694efcc45" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "PDF pages 36, 52", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_bdf4e4bb182563292d8042", "source": "resource_lib26_64b284d96b108e55", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_lib26_64b284d96b108e55" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "PDF page 67", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_e137c6071330ed36f390b1", "source": "resource_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 14855; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_90134a922df6785ecf4388", "source": "resource_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 14100; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_6d5cda4f307058708d1bfb", "source": "resource_sp26_c8e0812c1b5690e3", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_c8e0812c1b5690e3" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 670; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_10d3a364b5a4b552d19f26", "source": "resource_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 31891; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_eba5b17c838366b530ed8f", "source": "resource_sp26_b33b2336ebbaab08", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_b33b2336ebbaab08" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 6191; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_b36e7bb2e216a46ec596d0", "source": "resource_sp26_d247bb84f3b2c0fe", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_d247bb84f3b2c0fe" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 464878; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_967f137089491a2d517d48", "source": "resource_sp26_a24718379b3ee4d2", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_a24718379b3ee4d2" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 396846; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Multiple perspectives", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_7ad3774cb2fb4c3eefdc1f", "source": "resource_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Sections 1.1–1.2, printed pp. 323–324", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Inviting other perspectives is treated as an ongoing inquiry whose framing must also be questioned, rather than a guarantee of completeness.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "joins perspective-taking to responsibility for framing", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_46e7fae04981864af1a222", "source": "resource_sp26_f470df5093de1c87", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_f470df5093de1c87" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Section 1.2, printed pp. 312–313", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The authors apply the patterns to one another, including taking perspectives on a relationship. This does not establish equivalence with every earlier use of perspective-taking.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "includes perspective-taking in a recursive account of thinking", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e36_ssm_multiple_perspectives", "source": "method_or_methodology_soft_systems_methodology_ssm", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_checkland_models", "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation" ], "source_locator": "Checkland 2000, pp. S21, S32–S34, and S53", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "An account of SSM, not a claim that all multiple-perspective work is SSM. The models support discussion and accommodations for action; their use does not establish fairness or erase conflicting interests.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e36_ssm_multiple_perspectives", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses worldview-declared models to structure inquiry across differences", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "e36_boundary_critique_multiple_perspectives", "source": "concept_boundary_critique", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_ulrich_critique", "ev_u36_ulrich_power_legitimation" ], "source_locator": "Ulrich mini-primer, applications 1–3; Ulrich 2022, Q10–12 and closing paragraphs", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Ulrich describes cooperative and emancipatory uses. Exposing differing reference systems need not yield agreement or establish which boundary should govern action.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e36_boundary_critique_multiple_perspectives", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "examines how boundary judgements condition differing facts and values", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "e36_structure_agency_multiple_perspectives", "source": "concept_structure_agency", "target": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "relation_type": "qualifies_practice_claim", "relation_family": "contestation", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u36_bhaskar_persons_2020", "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_bhaskar_tmsa", "ev_u36_bhaskar_transition", "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation" ], "source_locator": "Bhaskar 2020, section 3, TMSA and transition; Checkland 2000, pp. S33–S34", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Editorial practice comparison: altered interpretations may matter, but a claim of structural change needs evidence of changes to the conditions of action. This does not claim that SSM ignores power or that the two authors share an ontology.", "assertion_mode": "inferred", "inference_method": "bounded editorial comparison of the cited primary accounts", "claim_id": "claim_e36_structure_agency_multiple_perspectives", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "requires more than a changed account to establish a changed social condition", "public_review_label": "Editorial comparison; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "claim_e36_ssm_multiple_perspectives", "statement": "An account of SSM, not a claim that all multiple-perspective work is SSM. The models support discussion and accommodations for action; their use does not establish fairness or erase conflicting interests.", "subject_id": "method_or_methodology_soft_systems_methodology_ssm", "predicate": "operationalises", "object_id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_checkland_models", "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "source_exposition; no human editorial acceptance implied.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106" }, { "id": "claim_e36_boundary_critique_multiple_perspectives", "statement": "Ulrich describes cooperative and emancipatory uses. Exposing differing reference systems need not yield agreement or establish which boundary should govern action.", "subject_id": "concept_boundary_critique", "predicate": "operationalises", "object_id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_ulrich_critique", "ev_u36_ulrich_power_legitimation" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "source_exposition; no human editorial acceptance implied.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106" }, { "id": "claim_e36_structure_agency_multiple_perspectives", "statement": "Editorial practice comparison: altered interpretations may matter, but a claim of structural change needs evidence of changes to the conditions of action. This does not claim that SSM ignores power or that the two authors share an ontology.", "subject_id": "concept_structure_agency", "predicate": "qualifies_practice_claim", "object_id": "concept_multiple_perspectives", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u36_bhaskar_persons_2020", "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_u36_bhaskar_tmsa", "ev_u36_bhaskar_transition", "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "editorial_synthesis; no human editorial acceptance implied.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106" } ], "sources": [ { "id": "src_skills_england_st0787_v12", "title": "Systems Thinking Practitioner apprenticeship standard ST0787 v1.2", "source_type": "government_standard", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://skillsengland.education.gov.uk/apprenticeships/st0787-v1-2", "date": "2025-02-20", "notes": "Current approved standard; requires concepts, laws, provenance, schools, ontology, epistemology, approaches, intervention, ethics and evaluation.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000", "title": "Soft systems methodology: a thirty year retrospective", "source_type": "primary_author_research_article", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public_full_text", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO;2-O", "date": "2000", "notes": "Primary article opened and relevant body passages inspected; 48-page PDF preserved privately with SHA-256 5848546f326e42c02c79c181aaee21998b9438cd08e81489c924e6db78800fd1. Publisher record confirms author, year, DOI, and reproduction note. Checkland's account of SSM is evidence for that methodology. It does not establish that every form of pluralism follows SSM, that accommodation is fair, or that an account of a situation abolishes material constraints.", "creators": [ "Peter Checkland" ], "doi": "10.1002/1099-1743(200011)17:1+<::AID-SRES374>3.0.CO;2-O", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Systems Research and Behavioral Science 17(S1), S11–S58", "licence": "publisher_terms; linked and paraphrased", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-11-06", "public_link_status": "public_link", "reading_url": "https://cdn.blot.im/folder/v-972dcafb/blog_2f78a95c02c14630961fdd8473cdfc33/files/_checkland-2000-systems_research_and_behavioral_science.pdf", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "source_locator": "Printed pp. S21, S32–S34, and S53; PDF pp. 11, 22–24, and 43", "access_note": "Checkland's account of SSM is evidence for that methodology. It does not establish that every form of pluralism follows SSM, that accommodation is fair, or that an account of a situation abolishes material constraints." }, { "id": "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "title": "A Mini-Primer of Critical Systems Heuristics", "source_type": "primary_text", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://wulrich.com/csh.html", "date": "checked 2026-08-19", "notes": "Author's page body inspected on 6 November 2026. It identifies normative boundary assumptions, cooperative and emancipatory uses, and limits on unique right answers. Enrich the existing record; retain its bibliographic history. Do not infer a fixed procedure from this primer or treat its account of CSH as evidence that another tradition is equivalent.", "creators": [ "Werner Ulrich" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "noncommercial_distribution_and_citation_with_attribution", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-11-06", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "source_locator": "Main text beginning Critical systems heuristics; paragraphs beginning A critical approach, The first two applications, and In short; final Summary", "access_note": "Enrich the existing record; retain its bibliographic history. Do not infer a fixed procedure from this primer or treat its account of CSH as evidence that another tradition is equivalent." }, { "id": "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022", "title": "Assessing assumptions about boundaries with critical systems heuristics", "source_type": "primary_author_method_article", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public_full_text", "url": "https://i2insights.org/2022/05/24/critical-systems-heuristics/", "date": "2022-05-24", "notes": "Article body inspected in HTML and visually on page 1 of the author-hosted PDF. PDF SHA-256 8066b8226259a16ec531333469a73d1a419d486a1172e04fb7e65d722f81daf1. The two-page PDF is a very tall webpage print, not a conventional paginated article. Its text mapping is damaged; the relevant page was visually checked. Later reader comments are excluded. The live page also displays an April 2025 update date; May 2022 is the original publication date confirmed by the preserved print.", "creators": [ "Werner Ulrich" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Integration and Implementation Insights", "licence": "source_terms; linked and paraphrased", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-11-06", "public_link_status": "public_link", "reading_url": "https://wulrich.com/downloads/ulrich_2022_CSH_blog.pdf", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "source_locator": "Questions 4–6 and 10–12; the four paragraphs immediately following question 12; author's PDF, page 1, before comments", "access_note": "The two-page PDF is a very tall webpage print, not a conventional paginated article. Its text mapping is damaged; the relevant page was visually checked. Later reader comments are excluded. The live page also displays an April 2025 update date; May 2022 is the original publication date confirmed by the preserved print." }, { "id": "src_ifsr_conversations_legacy", "title": "IFSR Conversations Legacy", "source_type": "federation_programme_archive", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://ifsr.org/systems-research/ifsr-conversations-legacy/", "date": "", "notes": "Official programme history describing small, non-hierarchical, cross-tradition dialogues as second-order reflective practice. Used for programme design, not as evidence that every conversation achieved integration or consensus.", "creators": [ "International Federation for Systems Research" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "International Federation for Systems Research", "licence": "source_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked_programme_history", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025", "title": "Systems convening and boundaries core slides", "source_type": "public_teaching_material", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/systems-convening-and-boundaries.pdf", "date": "2025-04-01", "notes": "Public teaching slides; no public link. Public PDF linked on 2026-09-19; the earlier unpublished access description is superseded.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "public_file_identity_checked", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_ing_pattern_manual_2016", "title": "Pattern Manual for Service Systems Thinking", "source_type": "primary_publication_record", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://coevolving.com/commons/20161028-pattern-manual-for-service-systems-thinking", "date": "checked 2026-08-14", "notes": "Primary record of Ing’s 2016 proposal to adapt generative pattern-language practice for service systems thinking, including the alternative pattern form of voices, values and spatio-temporal frames.", "creators": [ "David Ing" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Coevolving Innovations", "licence": "site terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_ing_coevolving_publications_2026", "title": "David Ing — Coevolving Innovations publications", "source_type": "primary_author_publication_index", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://coevolving.com/commons/publications", "date": "checked 2026-08-14", "notes": "Primary index for David Ing’s systems, service-systems and education publications and presentations. Useful for chronology and authorship; not independent evaluation.", "creators": [ "David Ing" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Coevolving Innovations", "licence": "site terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_better_conversations_2025", "title": "Better conversations for better realities: learning loops to break the devil's bargain", "source_type": "public_teaching_material", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/better-conversations-for-better-realities.pdf", "date": "2025-07-01", "notes": "Public author teaching deck connecting multiple worlds, whole-system planning, the ladder of inference and reinforcing feedback. Public PDF linked on 2026-09-19; the earlier unpublished access description is superseded.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "public_file_identity_checked", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "title": "SCiO CF Resources v9 draft", "source_type": "professional_framework_resource_guide", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2022-09-15", "notes": "SCiO internal competency-resource draft; no public link. Public SCiO accreditation pages are linked separately where possible.", "creators": [ "SCiO" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_legacy_internal_register_audit", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_accreditation_current", "title": "SCiO Professional Accreditation and Competency Framework", "source_type": "professional_body_page", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/professional-accreditation", "date": "2026-08-09", "notes": "Current framework fields and assessment process.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_ou_stip_2025", "title": "Understanding systems thinking in practice (Open University)", "source_type": "university_course", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/understanding-systems-thinking-practice-stip", "date": "2025-09-01", "notes": "Official Open University course covering five systems approaches and traditions of practice: SD, VSM, SODA, SSM and CSH.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "title": "An introductory systems thinking toolkit for civil servants", "source_type": "government_toolkit", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/toolkit", "date": "2023-01-12", "notes": "Official UK government introductory toolkit containing eleven named systems tools; explicitly non-comprehensive.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_cynefin_sensemaker_official_2026", "title": "SenseMaker — The Cynefin Company", "source_type": "official_product_and_method_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://thecynefin.co/sensemaker/", "date": "current; checked 2026-08-11", "notes": "Canonical first-party description of SenseMaker and its use of self-interpreted micro-narratives. Use project reports and independent evaluations for claims about results in particular settings.", "creators": [ "The Cynefin Company" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Cynefin Company", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_cynefin_dave_profile_2026", "title": "Dave Snowden — The Cynefin Company profile", "source_type": "official_professional_profile", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://thecynefin.co/team/dave-snowden/", "date": "current; checked 2026-08-11", "notes": "Canonical first-party source for Dave Snowden's present roles and the organisation's own account of his creation of Cynefin and origination of SenseMaker. It does not independently establish influence, efficacy or priority beyond those declared facts.", "creators": [ "The Cynefin Company" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Cynefin Company", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_lib26_3d2e2710c49aaf3d", "title": "Systems leadership, change, theory and practice", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/systems-leadership-change-theory-and-practice.pdf", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Public Antlerboy manifest. PDF text indexed; located concept terms, not a full scholarly review. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2023" }, { "id": "src_lib26_a9c290f694efcc45", "title": "Large-group processes", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/large-group-processes.pdf", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Public Antlerboy manifest. PDF text indexed; located concept terms, not a full scholarly review. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2024" }, { "id": "src_lib26_64b284d96b108e55", "title": "Core systems-change slide set", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/reference/redquadrant-systems-change-framework.pdf", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Public Antlerboy manifest. PDF text indexed; located concept terms, not a full scholarly review. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2020" }, { "id": "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "title": "Designing Social Systems in a Changing World", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9981-1", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Bela H. Banathy" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer US", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "1996" }, { "id": "src_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc", "title": "Response to paper “Systems Thinking” by D. Cabrera et al.: Systems thinking from a critical systems perspective", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.04.004", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Martin Reynolds" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Elsevier BV", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2008" }, { "id": "src_sp26_c8e0812c1b5690e3", "title": "Systems thinking: taming complexity in project management", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1108/10748121211235787", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Jim Sheffield", "Shankar Sankaran", "Tim Haslett" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Emerald", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2012" }, { "id": "src_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0", "title": "Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer London", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2010" }, { "id": "src_sp26_b33b2336ebbaab08", "title": "The history and future of projects as a transition innovation: Towards a sustainable project management framework", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2814", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Shankar Sankaran", "Mattias Jacobsson", "Tomas Blomquist" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Wiley", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2021" }, { "id": "src_sp26_d247bb84f3b2c0fe", "title": "Improving practice in safeguarding at the interface between hospital services and children’s social care: a mixed-methods case study", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr03040", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Susan White", "David Wastell", "Suzanne Smith", "Christopher Hall", "Emilie Whitaker", "Geoff Debelle", "Russell Mannion", "Justin Waring" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "National Institute for Health and Care Research", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2015" }, { "id": "src_sp26_a24718379b3ee4d2", "title": "Presencing the Future of Democracy and Governance", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.47061/jasc.v6i1.13060", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Oliver Koenig", "Eva Pomeroy", "Megan Seneque", "Otto Scharmer" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Presencing Institute, Inc.", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2026" }, { "id": "src_sp26_f470df5093de1c87", "title": "Distinctions, systems, relationships, and perspectives (DSRP): A theory of thinking and of things", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.04.001", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Derek Cabrera", "Laura Colosi" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Elsevier BV", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2008" }, { "id": "src_u36_bhaskar_persons_2020", "title": "Critical realism and the ontology of persons", "source_type": "primary_author_article_posthumous", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public_indexed_body", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1734736", "date": "2020-03-16", "notes": "Substantial publisher-indexed section 3 body inspected, with the publisher's presentation/publication note. Presented 25 July 2011 and published posthumously in 2020 with executors' permission. Direct HTML/PDF opening returned HTTP 403 during this pass; no local PDF or page-by-page inspection is claimed. The inspected indexed body supplies the section locator. This is Bhaskar's later retrospective account, not a verified reading of the 1979 book. His comparison with Giddens is attributed to him and is not adopted as an independently checked account of Giddens or Archer. Later metaReality claims are outside this packet.", "creators": [ "Roy Bhaskar" ], "doi": "10.1080/14767430.2020.1734736", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Journal of Critical Realism 19(2), 113–120", "licence": "publisher_terms; linked and paraphrased", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-11-06", "public_link_status": "public_link", "reading_url": "https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14767430.2020.1734736", "connection_pass": "depth_20261106", "source_locator": "Section 3, Contexts of persons: opening paragraphs on social domains and TMSA; paragraphs on conceptuality; concrete utopianism and the conditions of transition", "access_note": "Direct HTML/PDF opening returned HTTP 403 during this pass; no local PDF or page-by-page inspection is claimed. The inspected indexed body supplies the section locator. This is Bhaskar's later retrospective account, not a verified reading of the 1979 book. His comparison with Giddens is attributed to him and is not adopted as an independently checked account of Giddens or Archer. Later metaReality claims are outside this packet." } ], "evidence_locators": [ { "id": "ev_u36_checkland_models", "source_id": "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000", "locator": "Printed pp. S32 and S53; PDF pp. 22 and 43", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_u36_checkland_accommodation", "source_id": "src_u36_checkland_retrospective_2000", "locator": "Printed pp. S21 and S33–S34; PDF pp. 11 and 23–24", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_u36_ulrich_critique", "source_id": "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "locator": "Paragraphs on the first two applications, emancipatory boundary critique, and the normative focus of CSH", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_u36_ulrich_power_legitimation", "source_id": "src_u36_ulrich_boundaries_2022", "locator": "Questions 4–6 and 10–12; final four paragraphs after question 12; author PDF p. 1", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_u36_bhaskar_tmsa", "source_id": "src_u36_bhaskar_persons_2020", "locator": "Section 3, Contexts of persons, opening paragraphs on TMSA and conceptuality", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_u36_bhaskar_transition", "source_id": "src_u36_bhaskar_persons_2020", "locator": "Section 3, discussion of concrete utopianism, KQ4, and the paragraphs preceding KQ5", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" } ], "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded." }