{
  "schema_version": "1.0",
  "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_epistemic_injustice/",
  "release": "0.35",
  "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Epistemic injustice. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.35. https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_epistemic_injustice/",
  "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms",
  "entry": {
    "id": "concept_epistemic_injustice",
    "label": "Epistemic injustice",
    "entity_type": "concept",
    "description": "Wrong done to someone in their capacity as a knower, including credibility being unfairly reduced and gaps in shared interpretive resources that prevent experience being made intelligible.",
    "aliases": [],
    "boundary_ring": "0",
    "inclusion_reason": "feedback_led_release_0_17",
    "status": "accepted",
    "source_ids": [
      "src_oup_fricker_epistemic_injustice_2007"
    ],
    "set_tags": [
      "systems",
      "lineage",
      "release_0_17",
      "epistemology",
      "justice",
      "power"
    ],
    "espoused_labels": [],
    "observed_clusters": [],
    "canonical_definition": "Wrong done to someone in their capacity as a knower, including credibility being unfairly reduced and gaps in shared interpretive resources that prevent experience being made intelligible.",
    "valid_from": "",
    "valid_to": "",
    "external_ids": "{}",
    "geographies": [],
    "licence": "",
    "review_status": "curator_checked_public_sources",
    "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor",
    "reviewed_at": "2026-08-19",
    "x": 0.18,
    "y": 0.43,
    "canonical_id": "concept_epistemic_injustice",
    "public_visibility": "public",
    "publication_level": "profile",
    "public_stub_text": "",
    "public_source_count": 1,
    "no_public_link_count": 0
  },
  "profile": {
    "node_id": "concept_epistemic_injustice",
    "summary": "Epistemic injustice names wrongs within knowing: prejudice can reduce a person's credibility, and unequal interpretive resources can prevent experience becoming intelligible.",
    "canonical_definition": "Epistemic injustice names wrongs within knowing: prejudice can reduce a person's credibility, and unequal interpretive resources can prevent experience becoming intelligible.",
    "why_it_matters": "It gives the atlas a sharper way to examine whose evidence is admitted and which absences are produced by the field's own categories.",
    "key_distinctions": [
      "testimonial injustice",
      "hermeneutical injustice",
      "ignorance versus structured absence",
      "representation versus authority to know"
    ],
    "historical_lineage": [
      "social epistemology",
      "virtue epistemology",
      "feminist philosophy"
    ],
    "logical_antecedents": [
      "testimony",
      "interpretive resources",
      "social power"
    ],
    "dependent_subsequents": [
      "epistemic exclusion",
      "corrective epistemic practices"
    ],
    "practice_connections": [
      "participation design",
      "source policy",
      "canon review"
    ],
    "common_misreadings": [
      "Adding more speakers does not by itself change credibility rules or interpretive resources."
    ],
    "open_checks": [
      "Connect to standpoint, situated knowledge and decolonial epistemologies through primary sources."
    ],
    "source_ids": [
      "src_oup_fricker_epistemic_injustice_2007"
    ],
    "context_and_lineage": "",
    "editorial_note": "",
    "last_researched": "2026-08-19"
  },
  "connections": [
    {
      "id": "e17_book_develops_epistemic_injustice",
      "source": "publication_epistemic_injustice",
      "target": "concept_epistemic_injustice",
      "relation_type": "develops",
      "relation_family": "conceptual",
      "directed": "true",
      "dependency_kind": "",
      "confidence": "0.94",
      "claim_status": "accepted",
      "source_ids": [
        "src_oup_fricker_epistemic_injustice_2007"
      ],
      "evidence_ids": [],
      "source_locator": "Oxford Academic abstract and contents",
      "valid_from": "",
      "valid_to": "",
      "scope_conditions": "Uses the book's own conceptual vocabulary.",
      "assertion_mode": "asserted",
      "inference_method": "",
      "claim_id": "",
      "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor",
      "reviewed_at": "2026-08-19",
      "notes": "",
      "plain_phrase": "develops the distinction of",
      "public_review_label": "source-backed statement"
    }
  ],
  "claims": [],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "src_oup_fricker_epistemic_injustice_2007",
      "title": "Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing",
      "source_type": "publisher_record",
      "quality_tier": "A",
      "access": "public",
      "url": "https://academic.oup.com/book/32817",
      "date": "2007",
      "notes": "Oxford Academic record for Miranda Fricker's account of testimonial and hermeneutical injustice and the relation between knowing, prejudice and social power.",
      "creators": [
        "Miranda Fricker"
      ],
      "doi": "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001",
      "isbn": "9780198237907",
      "publisher": "Oxford University Press",
      "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated",
      "archived_url": "",
      "content_hash": "",
      "review_status": "checked",
      "last_checked": "2026-08-19",
      "public_link_status": "public_link"
    }
  ],
  "evidence_locators": [],
  "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded."
}