{ "schema_version": "1.0", "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_double_loop_learning/", "release": "0.35", "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Double-loop learning. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.35. https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_double_loop_learning/", "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms", "entry": { "id": "concept_double_loop_learning", "label": "Double-loop learning", "entity_type": "concept", "description": "Double-loop learning changes not only an action but the governing assumptions, values or rules by which the action was chosen. It is distinguished from correcting performance while leaving those rules intact.", "aliases": [], "boundary_ring": "0", "inclusion_reason": "seed_corpus", "status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sysbok_feedback_2013", "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "set_tags": [ "legacy_sysbok" ], "espoused_labels": [], "observed_clusters": [], "canonical_definition": "Learning that can question and alter governing values, assumptions, or organisational arrangements, rather than only improve action within them.", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "external_ids": "{}", "geographies": [], "licence": "", "review_status": "candidate", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "x": -0.445738, "y": -0.158669, "canonical_id": "concept_double_loop_learning", "public_visibility": "public", "publication_level": "profile", "public_stub_text": "", "public_source_count": 1, "no_public_link_count": 1, "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" }, "profile": { "node_id": "concept_double_loop_learning", "title": "Double-loop learning", "summary": "Argyris distinguishes learning within an organisation's governing framework from inquiry that can change that framework.", "canonical_definition": "Learning that can question and alter governing values, assumptions, or organisational arrangements, rather than only improve action within them.", "why_it_matters": "A team can discuss reflection fluently while keeping the same behaviour.", "key_distinctions": [ "espoused theory versus theory-in-use", "inquiry versus unilateral control", "knowing the vocabulary versus changing conduct" ], "practice_connections": [ "Compare stated rules with recorded decisions and responses to challenge." ], "common_misreadings": [ "A second feedback loop necessarily demonstrates double-loop learning.", "Removing all structure produces inquiry." ], "open_checks": [ "Check the conditions under which changed governing assumptions persist." ], "source_ids": [ "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev35_concept_double_loop_learning_1" ], "connection_pass": "depth_20261029", "profile_status": "evidence_deepened_research_pass", "last_researched": "2026-10-29", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "editorial_note": "Primary passages checked for this bounded research pass. Exposition and editorial comparisons remain distinct; named editorial acceptance is not implied by publication." }, "connections": [ { "id": "e16_source_crosswalk_014", "source": "intervention_skill_productive_conversations", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.90", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_clarity_practices_2024" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "slides 2 and 5-6", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The material states an author practice model; it does not evaluate outcomes independently.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "direct reading of supplied author material", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Slides 2 and 5-6 connect constructive conversation and reflection with examining the reasoning behind action.", "plain_phrase": "supports examination of reasoning and action in", "public_review_label": "source-backed author synthesis; no public link" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_001", "source": "intervention_skill_action_learning", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses reflective cycles associated with", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_004", "source": "intervention_skill_action_research", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses repeated inquiry associated with", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_014", "source": "intervention_skill_coaching", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "can surface assumptions through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_026", "source": "intervention_skill_critical_social_learning_systems", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "questions governing assumptions through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_072", "source": "intervention_skill_ladder_of_inference", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provides a conversational route into", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_082", "source": "intervention_skill_learning_design_and_learning_conversations", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "can design reflection for", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_103", "source": "intervention_skill_productive_conversations", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "supports examination of assumptions through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_121", "source": "intervention_skill_training_design", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "can develop reflective capability for", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_200", "source": "tool_monitoring_and_evaluation_strategy", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "can test assumptions through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_290", "source": "approach_family_systems_changes_learning", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_ing_systems_changes_learning_2022", "src_sysbok_feedback_2013" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "supports learning about governing frames through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "practice_edge_09f398516b8e987382", "source": "practice_lab_evaluation_and_reflexivity", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "provides_practice_for", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_practice_lab_evaluation_and_reflexivity" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "A basic mixed-evidence evaluation rehearsal. It is not a complete impact evaluation, statistical inference course or assessment of real practitioner behaviour.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for", "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence" }, { "id": "e26_dfb57b0a5f271f1731a713", "source": "resource_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 624682; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of Double-loop learning", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e35_learning_levels_double_loop", "source": "concept_bateson_learning_levels", "target": "concept_double_loop_learning", "relation_type": "compares_method", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u35_bateson_steps_1987", "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_1", "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_2" ], "source_locator": "Bateson, printed pp. 297–299; Argyris, p. 367", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Both accounts distinguish change within a framework from change involving that framework. This editorial comparison establishes neither equivalence nor historical influence.", "assertion_mode": "inferred", "inference_method": "curatorial comparison of the cited public sources", "claim_id": "claim35_e35_learning_levels_double_loop", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "offers a comparison of changed learning premises with", "public_review_label": "Editorial comparison; no historical influence asserted", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" }, { "id": "e35_double_loop_single_loop", "source": "concept_double_loop_learning", "target": "concept_single_loop_learning", "relation_type": "compares_method", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_double_loop_single_loop_1" ], "source_locator": "Printed p. 367", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Argyris allows double-loop inquiry to question an organisation's governing framework, while single-loop learning operates within it; the distinction is not a count of feedback arrows.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim35_e35_double_loop_single_loop", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "questions the framework retained in", "public_review_label": "Primary-source exposition; editorial acceptance open", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "claim35_e35_learning_levels_double_loop", "statement": "Both accounts distinguish change within a framework from change involving that framework. This editorial comparison establishes neither equivalence nor historical influence.", "subject_id": "concept_bateson_learning_levels", "predicate": "compares_method", "object_id": "concept_double_loop_learning", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u35_bateson_steps_1987", "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_1", "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_2" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Editorial comparison; no historical influence asserted", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" }, { "id": "claim35_e35_double_loop_single_loop", "statement": "Argyris allows double-loop inquiry to question an organisation's governing framework, while single-loop learning operates within it; the distinction is not a count of feedback arrows.", "subject_id": "concept_double_loop_learning", "predicate": "compares_method", "object_id": "concept_single_loop_learning", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_double_loop_single_loop_1" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Primary-source exposition; editorial acceptance open", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" } ], "sources": [ { "id": "src_sysbok_feedback_2013", "title": "SCiO SysBoK - Feedback v1", "source_type": "legacy_map_presentation", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2013-04-01", "notes": "Legacy SCiO SysBoK working presentation; no public link.", "creators": [ "SCiO" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_legacy_internal_register_audit", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976", "title": "Single-Loop and Double-Loop Models in Research on Decision Making", "source_type": "primary_text", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.2307/2391848", "date": "1976-09", "notes": "JSTOR issue contents confirm author, title, date, and pp. 363–375. The article's page-marked transcription was inspected separately; the Scribd AI-enhanced description was not used. Publisher access may be restricted. Reading copy is a third-party transcription. No claims of Bateson-to-Argyris influence are inferred from this comparison.", "creators": [ "Chris Argyris" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Administrative Science Quarterly 21(3), 363–375", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-29", "public_link_status": "public_link", "reading_url": "https://www.scribd.com/document/292149027/Angyris-s-Single-and-Double-Loop-Learning", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029", "source_locator": "Printed p. 367, Single-Loop and Double-Loop; pp. 368–370, Double-Loop Model and Transitional Model", "access_note": "Publisher access may be restricted. Reading copy is a third-party transcription. No claims of Bateson-to-Argyris influence are inferred from this comparison." }, { "id": "src_taylor_clarity_practices_2024", "title": "Clarity practices: five core practices", "source_type": "public_teaching_material", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/clarity-practices.pdf", "date": "2024-12-11", "notes": "Public author teaching deck connecting constructive conversation, clarity, reflection, culture shaping and intent in a learning and purposeful system. Public PDF linked on 2026-09-19; the earlier unpublished access description is superseded.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "public_file_identity_checked", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "title": "SCiO CF Resources v9 draft", "source_type": "professional_framework_resource_guide", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2022-09-15", "notes": "SCiO internal competency-resource draft; no public link. Public SCiO accreditation pages are linked separately where possible.", "creators": [ "SCiO" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_legacy_internal_register_audit", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_accreditation_current", "title": "SCiO Professional Accreditation and Competency Framework", "source_type": "professional_body_page", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/professional-accreditation", "date": "2026-08-09", "notes": "Current framework fields and assessment process.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "title": "An introductory systems thinking toolkit for civil servants", "source_type": "government_toolkit", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/toolkit", "date": "2023-01-12", "notes": "Official UK government introductory toolkit containing eleven named systems tools; explicitly non-comprehensive.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_ing_systems_changes_learning_2022", "title": "When Unfreeze-Move-Refreeze Isn’t Working", "source_type": "primary_publication_record", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://systemschanges.com/online/presentations/20220711-when-unfreeze-move-refreeze-isnt-working", "date": "checked 2026-08-14", "notes": "Primary account of Systems Changes Learning, including rhythmic shifts, texture/contexture, propensity, contextual-dyadic thinking and action learning.", "creators": [ "David Ing" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Systems Changes", "licence": "site terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_practice_lab_evaluation_and_reflexivity", "title": "Evaluation and reflexivity: test the claim you are tempted to make", "source_type": "practice_resource", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/evaluation-and-reflexivity/", "date": "2026-09-07", "notes": "Original fictional exercise. A basic mixed-evidence evaluation rehearsal. It is not a complete impact evaluation, statistical inference course or assessment of real practitioner behaviour.", "creators": [ "The Necessary Tangle editorial practice pack" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle", "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded", "last_checked": "2026-09-07", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_sp26_f455a61e7d99311f", "title": "Designing Social Systems in a Changing World", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9981-1", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Bela H. Banathy" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer US", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "1996" }, { "id": "src_u35_bateson_steps_1987", "title": "Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1987 reprint)", "source_type": "primary_text", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://ejcj.orfaleacenter.ucsb.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1972.-Gregory-Bateson-Steps-to-an-Ecology-of-Mind.pdf", "date": "1987", "notes": "Primary book opened and inspected. Copyright and catalogue pages identify the 1987 reprint, despite the filename beginning 1972. Do not reuse these page numbers for the Chicago edition without checking. Copyright retained; link and brief paraphrases only. Existing book node publication_steps_to_ecology_of_mind is reused.", "creators": [ "Gregory Bateson" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Jason Aronson; original collection published by Chandler in 1972", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-29", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029", "source_locator": "The Logical Categories of Learning and Communication: printed pp. 297–299 and 305–307 (PDF pp. 311–313 and 319–321); Form, Substance, and Difference: printed pp. 459–460 (PDF pp. 473–474)", "access_note": "Do not reuse these page numbers for the Chicago edition without checking. Copyright retained; link and brief paraphrases only. Existing book node publication_steps_to_ecology_of_mind is reused." } ], "evidence_locators": [ { "id": "ev35_concept_double_loop_learning_1", "source_id": "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976", "locator": "pp. 367–370", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_1", "source_id": "src_u35_bateson_steps_1987", "locator": "Bateson, printed pp. 297–299; Argyris, p. 367", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev35_edge_e35_learning_levels_double_loop_2", "source_id": "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976", "locator": "Bateson, printed pp. 297–299; Argyris, p. 367", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev35_edge_e35_double_loop_single_loop_1", "source_id": "src_u35_argyris_loops_1976", "locator": "Printed p. 367", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" } ], "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded." }