{ "schema_version": "1.0", "canonical_url": "https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_boundary/", "release": "0.35", "citation": "Taylor, B. P. (2026). Boundary. The Necessary Tangle, release 0.35. https://transduction.systems/entries/concept_boundary/", "licence": "CC BY-SA 4.0 for original atlas text and data; linked works retain their own terms", "entry": { "id": "concept_boundary", "label": "Boundary", "entity_type": "concept", "description": "A boundary makes inquiry and action possible by limiting what must be handled at once. It also externalises people, effects and responsibilities. Good systems work therefore treats boundary choice as practical, political and ethical.", "aliases": [ "boundaries", "system boundary", "boundary judgment", "boundary judgement", "Boundaries", "System boundary" ], "boundary_ring": "0", "inclusion_reason": "v0_3_coherent_cluster", "status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "set_tags": [ "systems", "critical_systems", "practice", "core_cluster", "unfix-32", "release_0_18" ], "espoused_labels": [], "observed_clusters": [], "canonical_definition": "A purpose- and observer-dependent distinction that marks what is treated as inside, outside or marginal to a system of concern and thereby shapes explanation, legitimacy and intervention.", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "external_ids": "{}", "geographies": [], "licence": "", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "x": -0.471698, "y": 0.215319, "canonical_id": "concept_boundary", "public_visibility": "public", "publication_level": "profile", "public_stub_text": "", "public_source_count": 2, "no_public_link_count": 1 }, "profile": { "node_id": "concept_boundary", "title": "Boundary", "profile_status": "evidence_deepened_research_pass", "canonical_definition": "A purpose- and observer-dependent distinction that marks what is treated as inside, outside or marginal to a system of concern and thereby shapes explanation, legitimacy and intervention.", "summary": "A boundary makes inquiry and action possible by limiting what must be handled at once. It also externalises people, effects and responsibilities. Good systems work therefore treats boundary choice as practical, political and ethical.", "why_it_matters": "Boundaries decide who counts, what becomes a cost, which outcomes are visible and where responsibility stops. Changing the boundary can change the apparent problem without changing any events.", "key_distinctions": [ "system boundary vs organisational border", "analytic boundary vs operational boundary", "inside/outside vs centre/margin", "temporary focus vs reified entity", "boundary judgement vs boundary object" ], "historical_lineage": [ "general systems and system/environment distinction", "critical systems heuristics", "systemic intervention and boundary critique", "boundary-spanning practice" ], "logical_antecedents": [ "distinction", "observer", "purpose", "context" ], "dependent_subsequents": [ "system of concern", "marginalisation", "transduction", "accountability", "intervention design" ], "practice_connections": [ "state the current boundary and purpose", "ask who and what is excluded", "test wider and narrower boundaries", "strengthen, suspend, cross, reframe or change boundaries deliberately" ], "espoused_lineages": [ "critical systems", "systemic intervention", "soft systems", "second-order cybernetics" ], "observed_clusters": [], "common_misreadings": [ "the boundary is obvious", "wider is always better", "open systems have no meaningful boundaries", "organisational charts define the system" ], "open_checks": [ "Midgley's full boundary critique", "Ulrich and CSH", "boundary objects", "boundary work in convening" ], "source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries", "ev_taylor_boundary_work" ], "last_researched": "2026-08-09", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "editorial_note": "Readable orientation and evidence-backed first pass. Named editorial review is still required before canonical acceptance." }, "connections": [ { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_001", "source": "law_or_principle_law_of_calling", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "develops", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_scio_grammar_case_multiple_disadvantage", "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes the act of drawing a system boundary explicit through", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_037", "source": "law_or_principle_law_of_crossing", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "develops", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "develops the change of position involved in crossing", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_056", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "law_or_principle_system_resonance_principle", "relation_type": "explanatory_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "sets the interface examined by", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_072", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "law_or_principle_darkness_principle", "relation_type": "explanatory_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_salah_grammar_part2_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes selective knowledge visible in", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_grammar_crosswalk_096", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "law_or_principle_first_black_box_principle", "relation_type": "explanatory_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.76", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "src_salah_grammar_part2_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Crosswalk from the maintained law description and cited Grammar sources to the target entry's maintained definition", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is an interpretive conceptual crosswalk. It does not assert direct historical influence, formal equivalence or universal validity. The wording should be challenged or strengthened with page-level evidence.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested semantic crosswalk of public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "sets the interface examined by", "public_review_label": "provisional conceptual crosswalk" }, { "id": "e18_unfix32_boundary", "source": "publication_unfix_32_key_concepts", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "includes_in_synthesis", "relation_family": "classification", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.94", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_unfix_32_key_concepts_2024" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Heading: Boundary", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This line records inclusion in Jurgen Appelo's named 32-concept synthesis. It does not endorse the definition, score or placement as a field consensus.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-19", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "includes in its synthesis", "public_review_label": "source-backed statement" }, { "id": "e_10_convening_applies_boundary", "source": "practice_systems_convening", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.86", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_wenger_trayner_systems_convening", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.10 public systems-work distinctions", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Working distinction based on the named public sources and curator materials; rival usage remains admissible.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, professional-body and practitioner sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-10", "notes": "The primary account centres learning across persistent boundaries and the legitimacy to convene across them.", "plain_phrase": "applies", "public_review_label": "supported working distinction" }, { "id": "e_10_leadership_applies_boundary", "source": "approach_family_systems_leadership", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.86", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_systems_leadership_schema_2021" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.10 public systems-work distinctions", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Working distinction based on the named public sources and curator materials; rival usage remains admissible.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, professional-body and practitioner sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-10", "notes": "Any account of systems leadership selects a system boundary and distributes authority across it.", "plain_phrase": "applies", "public_review_label": "supported working distinction" }, { "id": "e_10_practice_applies_boundary", "source": "practice_systems_practice", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.86", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_taylor_systems_terms_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.10 public systems-work distinctions", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Working distinction based on the named public sources and curator materials; rival usage remains admissible.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, professional-body and practitioner sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-10", "notes": "Choosing scope, scale, stakeholders and system levels is a core practical responsibility.", "plain_phrase": "applies", "public_review_label": "supported working distinction" }, { "id": "e_13_boundary_critique_boundary", "source": "concept_boundary_critique", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "specialises", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.13 public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Authorship, methodological development, conceptual dependence and practical use remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "Boundary critique concerns the judgements through which relevant systems and claims are delimited.", "plain_phrase": "specialises", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_13_osf_boundary", "source": "method_or_methodology_organic_systems_framework", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_triarchy_organic_systems_framework_2019" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.13 public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The wording is limited to the named public sources. Authorship, methodological development, conceptual dependence and practical use remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public primary, institutional and publisher sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "OSF treats system experience in relation to whole, part and context.", "plain_phrase": "uses", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_14_bounded_boundary", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "concept_bounded_applicability", "relation_type": "definitional_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.96", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_cynefin_io_framework_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Cynefin wiki, opening definition (paragraphs 6–10) and “How it Works” (paragraphs 49–52)", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The source's bounded-applicability claim concerns the validity of approaches within contexts; it does not make every boundary equally useful or legitimate.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "close reading of the first-party framework definition", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "The maintained Cynefin account defines bounded applicability through the boundaries within which context-specific approaches are valid.", "plain_phrase": "is a definitional prerequisite for", "public_review_label": "source-established framework definition" }, { "id": "e_14_estuarine_boundary", "source": "method_or_methodology_estuarine_mapping", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.88", "claim_status": "accepted", "source_ids": [ "src_cynefin_estuarine_mapping_2022" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Release 0.14 public primary, official, institutional and publisher sources", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The statement is limited to the named sources and their evidential role. First-party definition, authorship, historical development, application and independent evaluation remain distinct claims.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "curatorial synthesis of public sources", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-11", "notes": "The method works through the constraints shaping a possibility space.", "plain_phrase": "maps constraints and boundaries", "public_review_label": "supported working statement" }, { "id": "e_v03_boundary_information", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "concept_information", "relation_type": "constrains", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.75", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_operating_manual_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries", "ev_taylor_operating_manual_tests" ], "source_locator": "Core Thinking Integration and operating manual boundary tests", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "editorial synthesis from cited evidence", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "constrains", "public_review_label": "provisional" }, { "id": "e_v03_boundary_transduction", "source": "concept_boundary", "target": "concept_transduction", "relation_type": "explanatory_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "explanatory", "confidence": "0.84", "claim_status": "corroborated", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_transduction_2021", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_taylor_transduction_practice", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "source_locator": "Chosen Path transduction article; Core Thinking Integration transduction section", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "editorial synthesis from cited evidence", "claim_id": "claim_transduction_boundary_information", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "explanatory prerequisite", "public_review_label": "supported" }, { "id": "e_v03_distinction_boundary", "source": "concept_distinction", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "definitional_prerequisite", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "definitional", "confidence": "0.86", "claim_status": "corroborated", "source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "source_locator": "Midgley 2023 approach summary; Core Thinking Integration boundary section", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "editorial synthesis from cited evidence", "claim_id": "claim_boundary_requires_distinction", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "definitional prerequisite", "public_review_label": "supported" }, { "id": "e_v03_purpose_boundary", "source": "concept_purpose", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "constrains", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.82", "claim_status": "corroborated", "source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "source_locator": "Midgley 2023 approach summary; Core Thinking Integration boundary section", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "editorial synthesis from cited evidence", "claim_id": "claim_purpose_constrains_boundary", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "constrains", "public_review_label": "supported" }, { "id": "e_v03_systemic_intervention_boundary", "source": "method_or_methodology_systemic_intervention", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.92", "claim_status": "corroborated", "source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique" ], "source_locator": "article abstract and approach account", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "editorial synthesis from cited evidence", "claim_id": "claim_systemic_intervention_uses_boundary", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses", "public_review_label": "supported" }, { "id": "e16_source_crosswalk_003", "source": "approach_family_systems_change", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.90", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "slide 4", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Author synthesis; no public link and no independent evidence of intervention effectiveness.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "direct reading of supplied author material", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "Benjamin P Taylor", "reviewed_at": "2026-08-14", "notes": "Slide 4 treats the system boundary as constitutive of what change actors include in the system of concern.", "plain_phrase": "treats as constitutive of the system of concern", "public_review_label": "source-backed author synthesis; no public link" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_069", "source": "intervention_skill_ladder_of_abstraction", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_scio_accreditation_current", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes category changes visible alongside", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_175", "source": "method_or_methodology_socio_technical_systems", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "draws a joint social and technical", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_187", "source": "tool_context_diagrams", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "operationalises", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes a chosen system boundary visible through", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_203", "source": "tool_pig_model", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "applies", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provisionally appears to make discussable", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_207", "source": "tool_rich_picture", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "complements", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "keeps early inquiry open around", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "e16_relational_crosswalk_212", "source": "tool_systems_mapping", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "0.72", "claim_status": "provisional", "source_ids": [ "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Interpretive comparison of the two maintained public descriptions and their cited source records", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This is a provisional semantic or practice crosswalk. It does not establish historical influence, equivalence, efficacy or universal applicability. Item-level source review and curator acceptance are still required.", "assertion_mode": "interpreted", "inference_method": "curator-requested relational crosswalk of maintained public descriptions", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "depends on an explicit or implicit", "public_review_label": "provisional relational crosswalk" }, { "id": "practice_edge_41117e3157c92a24df", "source": "practice_lab_systems_concepts", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "provides_practice_for", "relation_family": "practice", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_practice_lab_systems_concepts" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Named exercise and its scope statement", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "A first rehearsal of boundaries, relationships, perspectives, feedback and emergence. It is not a complete treatment of systems philosophy or complexity science.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "provides a practice route for", "public_review_label": "Editorial practice connection, not accreditation or intellectual influence" }, { "id": "e26_24a2107463f7485e37e4c3", "source": "resource_lib26_2f21acc4e6b4a09f", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_lib26_2f21acc4e6b4a09f" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "PDF pages 1, 3", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of system boundary", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_01407008d77f08e139f5b9", "source": "resource_sp26_30f36de6718c38e2", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_30f36de6718c38e2" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 29885; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundaries", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_77a08334608ad3655356bd", "source": "resource_sp26_5c47864d7584087a", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_5c47864d7584087a" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 43873; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundaries", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_379c80bf14a4f92ad818fb", "source": "resource_sp26_24a7d0cd7a17ecba", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_24a7d0cd7a17ecba" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 16753; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundaries", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_aecda85e742112547070a6", "source": "resource_sp26_82aabbef7e96f5ee", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_82aabbef7e96f5ee" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 31294; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundary judgment", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_626d21ab0e8fac78b7483c", "source": "resource_sp26_582ee3907c844ea9", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_582ee3907c844ea9" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 4673; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundaries", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_766f23d957eb0c7f5553b9", "source": "resource_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 303746; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of system boundary", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_afea706bd368988fc23742", "source": "resource_sp26_9d21eb195a302c94", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "source_text_mentions", "relation_family": "documentary", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_9d21eb195a302c94" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Extracted source text, character 36841; page-level locator pending", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Exact phrase in extracted source text; page-level checking may remain pending as recorded by the locator. Its appearance may be in discussion, a quotation, a reference, or a critical comparison. No semantic or historical claim is inferred.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "contains a located mention of boundaries", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_7a18b9188c530dd4f07173", "source": "resource_lib26_2f21acc4e6b4a09f", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_lib26_2f21acc4e6b4a09f" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "PDF pp. 1–2", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "What a service is responsible for is shaped by institutions, budgets, authority, and ideology. The source argues that this should be part of inquiry and design, rather than assumed away.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "treats boundary-setting as a contested design decision", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e26_c8c1800d6a505e37b8f242", "source": "resource_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Section 1.2, printed pp. 323–324", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Holism and pluralism remain bounded. Reynolds asks that the limits and responsibility of a framing be made explicit.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "makes framing and boundary responsibility explicit through", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; independent review not recorded", "connection_pass": "library_20260919" }, { "id": "e31_module_bogdanov_3", "source": "publication_u31_bogdanov", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "presents_account_of", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u31_bogdanov" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_module_bogdanov_3" ], "source_locator": "p. 3, DG8; p. 4, PG4", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "In Challoner’s reconstruction: A tektological boundary arises within organisational interactions.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e31_module_bogdanov_3", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "presents account of", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "e31_concept_3", "source": "concept_tektological_complex", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "introduces_distinction", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u31_bogdanov" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_concept_3" ], "source_locator": "p. 3, DG8; p. 4, PG4", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "Source-scoped reading of Challoner’s module: The tektological account treats boundary formation as part of organisational interaction.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim_e31_concept_3", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "introduces distinction", "public_review_label": "Located source statement; curator review pending", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "e33_lab_concept_boundary", "source": "tool_ashby_laboratory", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "presents_account_of", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u33_ashby_laboratory" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "Chapter 4: Whose input is it?", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The exercise examines how a chosen boundary changes whether a quantity is treated as input or output.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "presents account of", "public_review_label": "Source-scoped candidate; editorial review remains open", "connection_pass": "update_20261018" }, { "id": "e34_42_boxes_concept_boundary", "source": "publication_42_boxes", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u34_42_boxes" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "System framing; the boundary between technical recovery and wider aviation disruption", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This records the paper’s use of a concept in its analysis, without treating the diagnosis as independently verified.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses in argument", "public_review_label": "Source-scoped candidate; editorial review remains open", "connection_pass": "update_20261024" }, { "id": "e34_42_health_concept_boundary", "source": "publication_42_health", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "uses_in_argument", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u34_42_health" ], "evidence_ids": [], "source_locator": "System framing; neighbourhood nested within place and wider arrangements", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "This records the paper’s use of a concept in its analysis, without treating the diagnosis as independently verified.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "uses in argument", "public_review_label": "Source-scoped candidate; editorial review remains open", "connection_pass": "update_20261024" }, { "id": "e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition", "source": "publication_fpcs_048", "target": "concept_boundary", "relation_type": "proposes_condition_for", "relation_family": "conceptual", "directed": "true", "dependency_kind": "", "confidence": "", "claim_status": "candidate", "source_ids": [ "src_u35_varela_maturana_uribe_1974" ], "evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition_1" ], "source_locator": "Section 7, pp. 191–192; section 9, points 4–6, p. 193", "valid_from": "", "valid_to": "", "scope_conditions": "The paper requires an autopoietic unity's boundary to be generated by its component interactions and sustained by the processes it enables. An analyst's selected boundary alone does not meet that condition.", "assertion_mode": "asserted", "inference_method": "", "claim_id": "claim35_e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "notes": "", "plain_phrase": "requires an autopoietic unity to produce its", "public_review_label": "Primary-source exposition; editorial acceptance open", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" } ], "claims": [ { "id": "claim_boundary_requires_distinction", "statement": "A system boundary is a distinction: changing the distinction changes what is treated as system, environment or margin.", "subject_id": "concept_distinction", "predicate": "definitional_prerequisite", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "corroborated", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Scope is deliberately narrow. Named editorial review is required.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "" }, { "id": "claim_purpose_constrains_boundary", "statement": "Boundary judgements are made for purposes and values; changing the purpose can change the relevant system of concern.", "subject_id": "concept_purpose", "predicate": "constrains", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "corroborated", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Scope is deliberately narrow. Named editorial review is required.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "" }, { "id": "claim_systemic_intervention_uses_boundary", "statement": "Systemic Intervention uses boundary critique to examine values and marginalisation before and during methodological choice.", "subject_id": "method_or_methodology_systemic_intervention", "predicate": "uses", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "corroborated", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_midgley_boundary_critique" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Scope is deliberately narrow. Named editorial review is required.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "" }, { "id": "claim_transduction_boundary_information", "statement": "Transduction concerns the transformation of information or variety between differently organised domains at a boundary.", "subject_id": "concept_boundary", "predicate": "explanatory_prerequisite", "object_id": "concept_transduction", "status": "corroborated", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_taylor_transduction_2021", "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_taylor_transduction_practice", "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Scope is deliberately narrow. Named editorial review is required.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "" }, { "id": "claim_e31_module_bogdanov_3", "statement": "In Challoner’s reconstruction: A tektological boundary arises within organisational interactions.", "subject_id": "publication_u31_bogdanov", "predicate": "presents_account_of", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u31_bogdanov" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_module_bogdanov_3" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Source-scoped interpretation. Human editorial acceptance remains pending.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "claim_e31_concept_3", "statement": "Source-scoped reading of Challoner’s module: The tektological account treats boundary formation as part of organisational interaction.", "subject_id": "concept_tektological_complex", "predicate": "introduces_distinction", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u31_bogdanov" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev_e31_concept_3" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Source-scoped interpretation. Human editorial acceptance remains pending.", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "update_20261008" }, { "id": "claim35_e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition", "statement": "The paper requires an autopoietic unity's boundary to be generated by its component interactions and sustained by the processes it enables. An analyst's selected boundary alone does not meet that condition.", "subject_id": "publication_fpcs_048", "predicate": "proposes_condition_for", "object_id": "concept_boundary", "status": "candidate", "supporting_source_ids": [ "src_u35_varela_maturana_uribe_1974" ], "supporting_evidence_ids": [ "ev35_edge_e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition_1" ], "contradicting_source_ids": [], "contradicting_evidence_ids": [], "notes": "Primary-source exposition; editorial acceptance open", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "reviewed_by": "", "reviewed_at": "", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029" } ], "sources": [ { "id": "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "title": "The Systemic Intervention Approach", "source_type": "peer_reviewed_research_article", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public_metadata", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2819", "date": "2023-01-01", "notes": "Gerald Midgley's account of systemic intervention: boundary critique, values, marginalisation and methodological pluralism are central to the approach.", "creators": [ "Gerald Midgley" ], "doi": "10.1002/sres.2819", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Systems Research and Behavioral Science", "licence": "publisher_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "title": "Core Thinking Integration", "source_type": "unpublished_working_synthesis", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2026-08-09", "notes": "Unpublished working synthesis; no public link.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Unpublished author material", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_prior_material_register_review", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025", "title": "Systems convening and boundaries core slides", "source_type": "public_teaching_material", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/talks/systems-convening-and-boundaries.pdf", "date": "2025-04-01", "notes": "Public teaching slides; no public link. Public PDF linked on 2026-09-19; the earlier unpublished access description is superseded.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "public_file_identity_checked", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_grammar_presentation_2022", "title": "The Grammar of Systems - SCiO presentation", "source_type": "presentation", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/grammar-systems", "date": "2022-03-21", "notes": "Lists 33 systems laws and principles and describes nine patterns of thinking.", "creators": [ "Patrick Hoverstadt" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_grammar_2ed_2025", "title": "The Grammar of Systems II: From Order to Chaos and Back Again, 2nd edition", "source_type": "book", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public_metadata", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/grammar-systems-ii-order-chaos-back-again-2nd-ed", "date": "2025-08-01", "notes": "Current second-edition metadata. The book presents nine systems-thinking patterns and 33 systems laws and principles.", "creators": [ "Patrick Hoverstadt" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "979-8298960878", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "publisher_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_grammar_case_multiple_disadvantage", "title": "Applying insight from Systems Laws to challenge thinking on, and service design for, the Multiple Disadvantage system", "source_type": "professional_case_study", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/resources/applying-insight-systems-laws-challenge-thinking-and-service-design-multiple-disadvantage", "date": "2026-01-01", "notes": "Public SCiO case illustrating the Law of Calling, Law of Sufficient Complexity and Conant-Ashby Theorem in practice.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "SCiO", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_salah_grammar_part1_2022", "title": "Cybersecurity Lessons from The Grammar of Systems, part 1", "source_type": "public_secondary_summary", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cybersecurity-lessons-from-grammar-systems-order-chaos-osama-salah/", "date": "2022-05-16", "notes": "Public secondary summary of Grammar of Systems items 1–11. Used as an accessible orientation aid; the book remains the controlling source.", "creators": [ "Osama Salah" ], "publisher": "LinkedIn", "licence": "publisher_terms", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_salah_grammar_part2_2022", "title": "Cybersecurity Lessons from The Grammar of Systems, part 2", "source_type": "public_secondary_summary", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/cybersecurity-lessons-from-grammar-systems-order-chaos-osama-salah-1f", "date": "2022-05-23", "notes": "Public secondary summary of Grammar of Systems items 12–22. Used as an accessible orientation aid; the book remains the controlling source.", "creators": [ "Osama Salah" ], "publisher": "LinkedIn", "licence": "publisher_terms", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_unfix_32_key_concepts_2024", "title": "32 Key Concepts in Systems Thinking and Complexity Theory", "source_type": "first_party_synthesis", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://unfix.com/blog/32-key-concepts", "date": "2024-07-15", "notes": "Jurgen Appelo's unFIX synthesis of 32 concepts. The page states that the list and prevalence scores were generated with several large language models and checked against the author's experience; it is a useful comparator, not a neutral or exhaustive canon.", "creators": [ "Jurgen Appelo" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "unFIX", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-19", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_wenger_trayner_systems_convening", "title": "Systems convening: the art of convening diverse voices across difficult boundaries", "source_type": "primary_author_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.wenger-trayner.com/systems-convening/", "date": "", "notes": "Primary public account by Beverly and Etienne Wenger-Trayner of systems convening as social-learning leadership across boundaries. Their FAQ explicitly says the work did not spring from systems theory.", "creators": [ "Beverly Wenger-Trayner", "Etienne Wenger-Trayner" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Wenger-Trayner", "licence": "CC 4.0 source terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_systems_leadership_schema_2021", "title": "A schema for better understanding systems leadership and systems change", "source_type": "public_curator_article", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://stream.syscoi.com/2021/06/21/a-schema-for-better-understanding-systems-leadership-and-systems-change/", "date": "2021-06-21", "notes": "Benjamin P Taylor's public working classification of six forms of systems leadership and its overlap with systems change. It is used as an explicit curatorial account, not as field-wide consensus.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Systems Community of Inquiry", "licence": "source_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_accreditation_current", "title": "SCiO Professional Accreditation and Competency Framework", "source_type": "professional_body_page", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.systemspractice.org/professional-accreditation", "date": "2026-08-09", "notes": "Current framework fields and assessment process.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_systems_terms_2022", "title": "What do systems leadership and systems change mean to you?", "source_type": "public_curator_article", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://chosen-path.org/2022/07/11/what-do-systems-leadership-and-systems-change-mean-to-you-what-questions-would-you-like-me-to-answer/", "date": "2022-07-11", "notes": "A public statement of Benjamin P Taylor's distinctions among systems leadership, systems change, systems theory, systems practice and systems convening. It is treated as a curatorial framing open to challenge.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "chosen path", "licence": "source_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-10", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_ulrich_csh_mini_primer_2023", "title": "A Mini-Primer of Critical Systems Heuristics", "source_type": "primary_author_method_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://wulrich.com/csh.html", "date": "2005; updated 2023-05-20", "notes": "Werner Ulrich's maintained primary account defines Critical Systems Heuristics as reflective practice centred on systematic boundary critique and twelve critical boundary questions.", "creators": [ "Werner Ulrich" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Werner Ulrich", "licence": "noncommercial_distribution_and_citation_with_attribution", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_triarchy_organic_systems_framework_2019", "title": "The Organic Systems Framework", "source_type": "official_publisher_book_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public_metadata", "url": "https://www.triarchypress.net/osf.html", "date": "2019", "notes": "Triarchy Press describes Barry Oshry's Organic Systems Framework as a pattern language for whole-system relationships and processes, including differentiation, integration, individuation and homogenisation.", "creators": [ "Barry Oshry" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "978-1-911193-61-6", "publisher": "Triarchy Press", "licence": "publisher_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_cynefin_io_framework_2026", "title": "Cynefin — Cynefin.io", "source_type": "official_collaborative_wiki_page", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://cynefin.io/wiki/Cynefin", "date": "current page; checked 2026-08-11", "notes": "First-party maintained account of Cynefin as a decision-support framework based on bounded applicability, its domains, dynamics and development. Appropriate for the framework's own definitions; pair with the named papers for historical and scholarly claims.", "creators": [ "Cynefin.io contributors" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Cynefin.io", "licence": "CC BY-SA unless otherwise indicated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_cynefin_estuarine_mapping_2022", "title": "Estuarine Mapping — The Cynefin Company", "source_type": "primary_author_method_page", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://thecynefin.co/estuarine-mapping/", "date": "2022", "notes": "Primary public introduction to Estuarine Mapping and its treatment of constraints and change. Later method material may supersede details; date and version should remain visible.", "creators": [ "Dave Snowden" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Cynefin Company", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-11", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_operating_manual_2026", "title": "Systems complexity cybernetics operating manual", "source_type": "unpublished_practice_manual", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2026-08-09", "notes": "Unpublished practice manual; no public link.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Unpublished author material", "licence": "not_publicly_licensed", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_prior_material_register_review", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_taylor_transduction_2021", "title": "Transduction - a powerful and important concept that few have heard of", "source_type": "practitioner_article", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://chosen-path.org/2021/10/06/transduction-a-powerful-and-important-concept-that-few-have-heard-of/", "date": "2021-10-06", "notes": "Benjamin P Taylor's practice account of Stafford Beer's use of transduction at organisational boundaries, including coding, decoding and the transformation of meaning and variety.", "creators": [ "Benjamin P Taylor" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "chosen path", "licence": "site_terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_scio_cf_resources_2022", "title": "SCiO CF Resources v9 draft", "source_type": "professional_framework_resource_guide", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "no_public_link", "url": "", "date": "2022-09-15", "notes": "SCiO internal competency-resource draft; no public link. Public SCiO accreditation pages are linked separately where possible.", "creators": [ "SCiO" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "pass4_legacy_internal_register_audit", "last_checked": "2026-08-14", "public_link_status": "no_public_link" }, { "id": "src_go_science_toolkit_2023", "title": "An introductory systems thinking toolkit for civil servants", "source_type": "government_toolkit", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/systems-thinking-for-civil-servants/toolkit", "date": "2023-01-12", "notes": "Official UK government introductory toolkit containing eleven named systems tools; explicitly non-comprehensive.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "", "licence": "", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "checked", "last_checked": "2026-08-09", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_practice_lab_systems_concepts", "title": "Systems concepts: make your boundary inspectable", "source_type": "practice_resource", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://transduction.systems/systems-thinking/practice/systems-concepts/", "date": "2026-09-07", "notes": "Original fictional exercise. A first rehearsal of boundaries, relationships, perspectives, feedback and emergence. It is not a complete treatment of systems philosophy or complexity science.", "creators": [ "The Necessary Tangle editorial practice pack" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "The Necessary Tangle", "licence": "Original practice text CC BY-SA 4.0; external material retains source terms", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "original_material_and_source_boundary_recorded", "last_checked": "2026-09-07", "public_link_status": "public_link" }, { "id": "src_lib26_2f21acc4e6b4a09f", "title": "Service systems, citizen ecosystems, and the politics we deny", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://antlerboy.com/library/files/preprints/2026-service-systems-citizen-ecosystems-and-the-politics-we-deny-v3-taylor.pdf", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Public Antlerboy manifest. PDF text indexed; located concept terms, not a full scholarly review. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Benjamin P Taylor public work library", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2026" }, { "id": "src_sp26_30f36de6718c38e2", "title": "Epistemological and empirical challenges of Niklas Luhmann’s systems theory: an interview with professors Álvaro Pires and Lukas Sosoe", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6172202109", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Álvaro Pires", "Lukas Sosoe", "Lucas Fucci Amato", "Marco Antonio Loschiavo Leme de Barros", "Gabriel Ferreira da Fonseca" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "FapUNIFESP (SciELO)", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2021" }, { "id": "src_sp26_5c47864d7584087a", "title": "Early-warning signals for critical transitions", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Marten Scheffer", "Jordi Bascompte", "William A. Brock", "Victor Brovkin", "Stephen R. Carpenter", "Vasilis Dakos", "Hermann Held", "Egbert H. van Nes", "Max Rietkerk", "George Sugihara" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer Science and Business Media LLC", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2009" }, { "id": "src_sp26_24a7d0cd7a17ecba", "title": "Introduction‐“Chaordic systems thinking” for learning organizations", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470410548773", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Frans M. van Eijnatten", "Goran D. Putnik" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Emerald", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2004" }, { "id": "src_sp26_82aabbef7e96f5ee", "title": "Designing interagency responses to wicked problems: A viable system model board game", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.06.040", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Pamela Sydelko", "Angela Espinosa", "Gerald Midgley" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Elsevier BV", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2024" }, { "id": "src_sp26_582ee3907c844ea9", "title": "People and Systems — Creating Networks of System Leadership and Practice", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.22324/ijhrdppr.4.105", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "", "Steve Keyes", "Manraj Kehla", "", "Frances Storr", "", "John Walsh", "" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Walter de Gruyter GmbH", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2019" }, { "id": "src_sp26_a63f52d3fe0bc7c0", "title": "Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-809-4", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Springer London", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2010" }, { "id": "src_sp26_9d21eb195a302c94", "title": "The dynamics of purposeful change: a model", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10243-230304", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Howard Silverman", "Gregory M. Hill" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Resilience Alliance, Inc.", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2018" }, { "id": "src_sp26_6c03265c17b1f0bc", "title": "Response to paper “Systems Thinking” by D. Cabrera et al.: Systems thinking from a critical systems perspective", "source_type": "public_catalogue_record", "quality_tier": "C", "access": "public", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.04.004", "date": "2026-09-19", "notes": "Opening title and DOI; Crossref publisher metadata. Bibliographic identity matched; source text indexed. Identity and located teaching relationships are separated from automatic title matches and exact text mentions. A term appearing in a source is not proof of its definition, endorsement, influence, or logical dependence.", "creators": [ "Martin Reynolds" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Elsevier BV", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "located_public_record", "last_checked": "2026-09-19", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "library_20260919", "year": "2008" }, { "id": "src_u31_bogdanov", "title": "Bogdanov: organisation and its changing boundaries: researcher module", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://rational-understanding.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/bogdanov-researcher-module.pdf", "date": "2026", "notes": "John A Challoner’s version 1 reconstruction, 30 September 2026. General and specialised definitions/propositions are labelled separately; original-author wording is not implied.", "creators": [ "John A Challoner" ], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Rational Understanding", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "7a8fc7cf51ad4f92932c3e08ebd31649508f30304a9e48215fe86b0c893d9546", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-08", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261008", "source_locator": "Complete PDF, 7 pages; specific claims carry page and proposition references", "source_role": "secondary reconstruction", "pages_read": 7 }, { "id": "src_u33_ashby_laboratory", "title": "Ashby Laboratory", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://ashby-laboratory.benjaming98765.chatgpt.site/", "date": "2026", "notes": "An independent interactive learning resource adapting concepts from W. Ross Ashby's An Introduction to Cybernetics (1956). Authorship of the original book belongs to Ashby; the modern exercises are adaptations. 56 exercises across chapters 3–6 and 45 glossary entries. Public content.js, app.js and engine.js inspected; full interactive correctness and accessibility testing are not claimed.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Ashby Laboratory", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-18", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261018", "source_locator": "Public chapter collections and exercise names in content.js; app.js navigation and engine.js inspected" }, { "id": "src_u34_42_boxes", "title": "Between the Boxes", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://42systemicreview.org/papers/between-the-boxes", "date": "2026", "notes": "The review examines how a bounded air-traffic-control failure can propagate through a wider aviation system. Its system boundary and account of cross-organisational responsibility are analytical choices, separate from a technical incident investigation.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Original author or publisher", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-24", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261024", "source_locator": "Executive Summary; Findings; System Framing and Method" }, { "id": "src_u34_42_health", "title": "Neighbourhood Health and Care: Building the System Before the Structure", "source_type": "public_source", "quality_tier": "B", "access": "public", "url": "https://42systemicreview.org/papers/neighbourhood-health-and-care", "date": "2026", "notes": "The review treats neighbourhood working as the formation of a viable system across established organisations. It examines autonomy, coordination, and stabilising organisational feedback; its policy and causal claims remain attributed to the paper.", "creators": [], "doi": "", "isbn": "", "publisher": "Original author or publisher", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "source_scoped_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-24", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "update_20261024", "source_locator": "Executive Summary; Findings; System Framing and Method" }, { "id": "src_u35_varela_maturana_uribe_1974", "title": "Autopoiesis: The Organization of Living Systems, Its Characterization and a Model", "source_type": "primary_text", "quality_tier": "A", "access": "public", "url": "https://homepages.math.uic.edu/~kauffman/MUV.pdf", "date": "1974", "notes": "Full ten-page primary-paper scan inspected on Louis Kauffman's University of Illinois Chicago page. Section 3 defines the organisation; section 9 gives an operational identification key. The model is an illustration of the proposed organisation, not empirical validation of all biological or social applications. The paper's algorithm was not independently rerun. Publisher redirect was inaccessible; university-hosted scan worked. Existing publication_fpcs_048 is reused.", "creators": [ "F. G. Varela", "H. R. Maturana", "R. Uribe" ], "doi": "10.1016/0303-2647(74)90031-8", "isbn": "", "publisher": "BioSystems 5(4), pp. 187–196", "licence": "source terms unless otherwise stated", "archived_url": "", "content_hash": "", "review_status": "passage_checked_research_pass", "last_checked": "2026-10-29", "public_link_status": "public_link", "connection_pass": "depth_20261029", "source_locator": "Sections 2–4, pp. 187–189; section 7, pp. 191–192; section 9, pp. 192–193", "access_note": "The model is an illustration of the proposed organisation, not empirical validation of all biological or social applications. The paper's algorithm was not independently rerun. Publisher redirect was inaccessible; university-hosted scan worked. Existing publication_fpcs_048 is reused." } ], "evidence_locators": [ { "id": "ev_midgley_boundary_critique", "source_id": "src_midgley_systemic_intervention_2023", "locator": "abstract and account of the approach", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_taylor_core_distinctions_boundaries", "source_id": "src_taylor_core_thinking_2026", "locator": "sections beginning 'systems work is not mapping the system' and 'a system boundary is not innocent'", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_taylor_boundary_work", "source_id": "src_taylor_boundaries_convening_2025", "locator": "slides 2, 4 and 6", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_taylor_operating_manual_tests", "source_id": "src_taylor_operating_manual_2026", "locator": "boundary, evidence, power, dynamics, variety, second-order and ethics tests", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_taylor_transduction_practice", "source_id": "src_taylor_transduction_2021", "locator": "sections on Beer, organisational boundaries and coding/decoding", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_e31_module_bogdanov_3", "source_id": "src_u31_bogdanov", "locator": "p. 3, DG8; p. 4, PG4", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev_e31_concept_3", "source_id": "src_u31_bogdanov", "locator": "p. 3, DG8; p. 4, PG4", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" }, { "id": "ev35_edge_e35_autopoiesis_boundary_condition_1", "source_id": "src_u35_varela_maturana_uribe_1974", "locator": "Section 7, pp. 191–192; section 9, points 4–6, p. 193", "review_status": "research_pass_needs_editor" } ], "reuse_note": "Preserve source attribution, scope, and review status. Source documents and evidence excerpts are excluded." }